Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,456 of 84,120 nationally

Chinatown Eviction Risk: Elevated , Portland

Tract 41051002101 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 1,704 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 41051002101 belongs to the Chinatown area of Portland, Oregon. It is home to 1,704 residents and scores 7.2/10, an elevated reading for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #3,226 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 39% of renter households, a high level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,684 a month while the average household earns $73,043 a year, roughly 28% of income at the averages. About 100% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39% Stable renters 61% Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units1,080
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate23.8%
Median income$73,043

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 8 tracts In Chinatown
Moderate
Within parent city
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#27 of 168 tracts In Portland
High
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#83 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portland and the region

Centroid at 45.5233, -122.6612 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chinatown scores 6.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
23.8% poverty · this tract
5.9
Supply constraint
$1,684 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5

How Chinatown compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chinatown risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.56.5This tracttract 002101Portland: 8.18.1Portlandparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 57

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 543Total filings 2020-21
  • 7.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 3.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (7.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 17 filings (5.67× baseline)2023-01-01: 13 filings (4.33× baseline)2023-02-01: 11 filings (5.50× baseline)2023-03-01: 13 filings (4.33× baseline)2023-04-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 14 filings (14.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 12 filings (12.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 18 filings (6.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 9 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 16 filings (5.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-05-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-07-01: 14 filings (14.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 18 filings (9.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 16 filings (5.33× baseline)2024-11-01: 8 filings (8.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 11 filings (3.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 10 filings (3.33× baseline)2025-02-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 22 filings (7.33× baseline)2025-04-01: 14 filings (2.80× baseline)2025-05-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-07-01: 13 filings (13.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 14 filings (7.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 16 filings (16.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 16 filings (5.33× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2026-01-01: 10 filings (3.33× baseline)2026-02-01: 16 filings (8.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 20 filings (6.67× baseline)2026-04-01: 17 filings (3.40× baseline)2026-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chinatown. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chinatown

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portland eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 3.00x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 57th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051002101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051002101?

Census tract 41051002101 in the Chinatown neighborhood scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051002101?

Median gross rent is $1,684/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051002101?

23.8% of residents in tract 41051002101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,704.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051002101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 57th, household 3th, minority 46th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 41051002101 considered part of Chinatown?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051002101 fall within Chinatown (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 41051002101 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 3.00× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 41051002101 compare to Portland overall?

Tract 41051002101 scores 6.5/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 41051002101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 24% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portland

Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related