Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,797 of 84,120 nationally

Ladd's Addition Eviction Risk: High , Portland

Tract 41051001101 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 2,994 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

41051001101 is a census tract in the Ladd's Addition area of Portland, OR. It scores 9.1/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,994. 93% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Risk score
9.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43% Stable renters 51% Owners 6%
Tract context
Occupied units2,143
Renter share93.3%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate21.3%
Median income$56,101

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Ladd's Addition
Very High
Within parent city
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 168 tracts In Portland
High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portland and the region

Centroid at 45.5133, -122.6613 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ladd's Addition scores 9.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
21.3% poverty · this tract
5.3
Supply constraint
$1,425 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5

How Ladd's Addition compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ladd's Addition risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.1This tracttract 0011017.7Portlandparent city7.4Countyavg tract in county6.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 50

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 799Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 4.40%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.3%Peak (2001)
  • 35Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 41051001101
Filings dropped 45% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 400Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.74×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ladd's Addition. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ladd's Addition

The score leans hardest on local political climate at 9/10. Severe burden reaches 26%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10. Against the Multnomah County average of 7.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.7 points.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 799 filings here across 16 tracked years.

Against Multnomah County at 49.7%, 46% of renters here are cost-burdened. At $1,425 a month, rents run 14% under what the rest of Portland commands. The worst year on record was 2001, when 10.3% of renter households were served.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Portland. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.4% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051001101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051001101?

Census tract 41051001101 in the Ladd's Addition neighborhood scores 9.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051001101?

Median gross rent is $1,425/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051001101?

21.3% of residents in tract 41051001101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,994.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051001101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 2th, minority 42th, housing 93th.
Q5

Is tract 41051001101 considered part of Ladd's Addition?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051001101 fall within Ladd's Addition (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051001101?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 799 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051001101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.40% of renter households, peaking at 10.3% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41051001101 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.74× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41051001101 compare to Portland overall?

Tract 41051001101 scores 9.1/10, higher than the parent city of Portland at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 41051001101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 12% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portland

Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related