Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,554 of 84,120 nationally

Mountain Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Portland

Tract 41051006403 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 4,414 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 41051006403 belongs to the Mountain Park neighborhood of Portland, Oregon. It is home to 4,414 residents and scores $1/10, an elevated reading for landlords. It lands near the 94th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 70% of renter households, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,551 a month against an average household income of $92,453 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 47% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 14% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,832
Renter share47.4%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$92,453

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Mountain Park
Moderate
Within parent city
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#103 of 168 tracts In Portland
Low
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#111 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Moderate
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#393 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portland and the region

Centroid at 45.4474, -122.7209 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mountain Park scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,551 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5

How Mountain Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mountain Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 006403Portland: 8.18.1Portlandparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 33

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 481Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 4.36%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.5%Peak (2005)
  • 28Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410510064032000: 36 filings (5.60/100 renter HHs)2001: 41 filings (6.38/100 renter HHs)2002: 32 filings (4.98/100 renter HHs)2003: 27 filings (4.20/100 renter HHs)2004: 28 filings (4.36/100 renter HHs)2005: 45 filings (6.49/100 renter HHs)2006: 42 filings (6.06/100 renter HHs)2007: 23 filings (3.32/100 renter HHs)2008: 34 filings (4.90/100 renter HHs)2009: 24 filings (3.46/100 renter HHs)2010: 25 filings (3.05/100 renter HHs)2012: 37 filings (5.17/100 renter HHs)2013: 19 filings (2.66/100 renter HHs)2014: 21 filings (2.94/100 renter HHs)2015: 19 filings (2.66/100 renter HHs)2016: 28 filings (3.46/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 22% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 184Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.28×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-01-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-09-01: 9 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mountain Park

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portland eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 33rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 481 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 4.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.5% of renter households in 2005.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051006403

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051006403?

Census tract 41051006403 in the Mountain Park neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051006403?

Median gross rent is $1,551/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051006403?

8.6% of residents in tract 41051006403 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,414.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051006403?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 18th, minority 44th, housing 65th.
Q5

Is tract 41051006403 considered part of Mountain Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051006403 fall within Mountain Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051006403?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 481 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051006403 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.36% of renter households, peaking at 6.5% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41051006403 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.28× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41051006403 compare to Portland overall?

Tract 41051006403 scores 5.1/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portland

Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related