Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally

Troutdale Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 41051010500 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 3,863 · 6% of tract blocks fall in Troutdale

Eviction risk in Troutdale eviction risk in Multnomah County centers on tract 41051010500, which scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 3,863 residents. That is riskier than roughly 82% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 43% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,786 monthly, set against $108,924 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 16% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 9% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,407
Renter share15.7%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$108,924

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Troutdale
Low
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#196 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Very Low
Within state
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#860 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Very Low
National
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#60,063 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Troutdale and the region

Centroid at 45.5685, -122.0445 · click any tract to drill in

Why Troutdale scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Troutdale
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,786 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Troutdale
7.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Troutdale
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Troutdale
6.0

How Troutdale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Troutdale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 010500Troutdale: 7.07.0Troutdaleparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 65Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 1.79%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.5%Peak (2002)
  • 3Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410510105002000: 2 filings (0.87/100 renter HHs)2001: 5 filings (2.18/100 renter HHs)2002: 8 filings (3.49/100 renter HHs)2003: 3 filings (1.31/100 renter HHs)2004: 4 filings (1.75/100 renter HHs)2005: 2 filings (0.70/100 renter HHs)2006: 7 filings (2.46/100 renter HHs)2007: 2 filings (0.70/100 renter HHs)2008: 4 filings (1.40/100 renter HHs)2009: 6 filings (2.10/100 renter HHs)2010: 6 filings (2.30/100 renter HHs)2012: 3 filings (1.32/100 renter HHs)2013: 7 filings (3.08/100 renter HHs)2014: 3 filings (1.32/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 3 filings (1.84/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 50% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 14Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.58×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Troutdale

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Troutdale eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and in line with the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.58x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 65 eviction filings here over 15 tracked years, with about 1.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.5% of renter households in 2002.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051010500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051010500?

Census tract 41051010500 in Troutdale scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051010500?

Median gross rent is $1,786/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051010500?

6.9% of residents in tract 41051010500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,863.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051010500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 47th, minority 31th, housing 69th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051010500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 65 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 41051010500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.79% of renter households, peaking at 3.5% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 41051010500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.58× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 41051010500 compare to Troutdale overall?

Tract 41051010500 scores 2.9/10, lower than the parent city of Troutdale at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Troutdale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Troutdale

Top eight tracts in Troutdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related