Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

Central City Eviction Risk: Lower , Gresham

Tract 41051009906 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 4,025 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 41051009906 covers the Central City area of Gresham, home to 4,025 residents. For landlords it grades 6.4/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 84% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 50% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,555 a month against an average household income of $126,995 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 15% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 7% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,497
Renter share14.8%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate2.3%
Median income$126,995

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Central City
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 22 tracts In Gresham
Very Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#194 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Very Low
Within state
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#801 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Gresham and the region

Centroid at 45.4834, -122.4318 · click any tract to drill in

Why Central City scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Gresham
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
2.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,555 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Gresham
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Gresham
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Gresham
7.5

How Central City compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Central City risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 009906Gresham: 7.47.4Greshamparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 12

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 198Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 6.23%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.7%Peak (2003)
  • 4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410510099062000: 6 filings (3.47/100 renter HHs)2001: 9 filings (5.20/100 renter HHs)2002: 11 filings (6.36/100 renter HHs)2003: 22 filings (12.72/100 renter HHs)2004: 15 filings (8.67/100 renter HHs)2005: 21 filings (10.54/100 renter HHs)2006: 18 filings (9.03/100 renter HHs)2007: 8 filings (4.02/100 renter HHs)2008: 13 filings (6.52/100 renter HHs)2009: 21 filings (10.54/100 renter HHs)2010: 15 filings (5.91/100 renter HHs)2012: 10 filings (4.13/100 renter HHs)2013: 6 filings (2.48/100 renter HHs)2014: 12 filings (4.96/100 renter HHs)2015: 7 filings (2.89/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (2.23/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 33% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 76Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.24×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Central City. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Central City

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Gresham eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 12th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 2.24x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051009906

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051009906?

Census tract 41051009906 in the Central City neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051009906?

Median gross rent is $1,555/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051009906?

2.3% of residents in tract 41051009906 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,025.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051009906?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 24th, minority 28th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 41051009906 considered part of Central City?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051009906 fall within Central City (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051009906?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 198 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051009906 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.23% of renter households, peaking at 12.7% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41051009906 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.24× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41051009906 compare to Gresham overall?

Tract 41051009906 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Gresham at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Gresham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Gresham

Top eight tracts in Gresham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related