Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,906 of 84,120 nationally

Progress Eviction Risk: Elevated , Tigard

Tract 41067030600 · Washington County, OR · pop 5,762 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

41067030600 is a census tract in the Progress area of Metzger, OR. It scores 6.6/10 for landlords. The severe-burden share is 54%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
6.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 14% Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units2,355
Renter share38.3%
SVI overall0.54
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$107,715

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Progress
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Tigard
Moderate
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#48 of 134 tracts In Washington County
Elevated
Within state
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#378 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tigard and the region

Centroid at 45.4464, -122.7557 · click any tract to drill in

Why Progress scores 6.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tigard
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,774 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tigard
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tigard
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tigard
7.1

How Progress compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Progress risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.6This tracttract 0306006.2Tigardparent city6.1Countyavg tract in county6.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 54

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 110Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 2.21%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.4%Peak (2018)
  • 27Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 41067030600
Filings climbed 17% over the past 6 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 163Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.83×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Progress. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Progress

Against Washington County at 45.7%, 63% of renters here are cost-burdened. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.3/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.6/10.

The filing record is not thin: 110 evictions over 6 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2018 at 3.4% of renter households.

Average gross rent is $1,774, 9% above the Metzger average. In a typical year about 2.2% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 82% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. It tracks the Washington County average of 6.1 closely. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $107,715.

38% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 41067030600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41067030600?

Census tract 41067030600 in the Progress neighborhood scores 6.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41067030600?

Median gross rent is $1,774/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41067030600?

10.3% of residents in tract 41067030600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,762.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41067030600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 69th, minority 43th, housing 45th.
Q5

Is tract 41067030600 considered part of Progress?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41067030600 fall within Progress (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41067030600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 110 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 41067030600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.21% of renter households, peaking at 3.4% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41067030600 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.83× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41067030600 compare to Tigard overall?

Tract 41067030600 scores 6.6/10, higher than the parent city of Tigard at 6.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tigard eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related