Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

Progress Eviction Risk: Lower , Tigard

Tract 41067030600 · Washington County, OR · pop 5,762 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Eviction risk in the Progress area of Tigard centers on tract 41067030600, which scores 6.6/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 5,762 residents. It lands near the 88th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 63% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 54% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,774 monthly, set against $107,715 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 38% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 14% Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units2,355
Renter share38.3%
SVI overall0.54
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$107,715

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Progress
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Tigard
Moderate
Within county
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#56 of 134 tracts In Washington County
Elevated
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#787 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tigard and the region

Centroid at 45.4464, -122.7557 · click any tract to drill in

Why Progress scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tigard
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,774 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tigard
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tigard
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tigard
7.1

How Progress compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Progress risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 030600Tigard: 6.96.9Tigardparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 54

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 110Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 2.21%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.4%Peak (2018)
  • 27Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410670306002012: 23 filings (2.68/100 renter HHs)2013: 16 filings (1.87/100 renter HHs)2014: 13 filings (1.52/100 renter HHs)2015: 15 filings (1.75/100 renter HHs)2016: 16 filings (2.03/100 renter HHs)2018: 27 filings (3.42/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 17% over the past 6 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 163Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.83×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2023-01-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-12-01: 8 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Progress. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Progress

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tigard eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Washington County average of 5.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.83x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 110 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 2.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.4% of renter households in 2018.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41067030600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41067030600?

Census tract 41067030600 in the Progress neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41067030600?

Median gross rent is $1,774/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41067030600?

10.3% of residents in tract 41067030600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,762.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41067030600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 69th, minority 43th, housing 45th.
Q5

Is tract 41067030600 considered part of Progress?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41067030600 fall within Progress (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41067030600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 110 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 41067030600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.21% of renter households, peaking at 3.4% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41067030600 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.83× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41067030600 compare to Tigard overall?

Tract 41067030600 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Tigard at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tigard eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related