Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally
Progress Eviction Risk: Lower , Tigard
Tract 41067030900 · Washington County, OR · pop 5,636 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
How risky is the Progress neighborhood of Tigard for landlords? Census tract 41067030900 scores 6.2/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 80% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 49% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,652 a month against an average household income of $80,308 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 58% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units2,372
Renter share58.2%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate12.0%
Median income$80,308
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
91
th percentile
Very High
Within county
70
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
30
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tigard and the region
Centroid at 45.4446, -122.7755 · click any tract to drill in
Why Progress scores 3.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Tigard
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
12.0% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$1,652 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tigard
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tigard
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tigard
5.6
How Progress compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 69%Socioeconomic
- 22%Household composition
- 62%Racial/ethnic minority
- 71%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 307Total filings over 6 yrs
- 3.68%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.5%Peak (2012)
- 42Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 31% over the past 6 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 607Total filings 2020-21
- 7.9Avg monthly (observed)
- 4.8Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.65×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Progress. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Progress
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tigard eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Washington County average of 5.9 and in line with the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 63rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.65x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 41067030900
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41067030900?
Census tract 41067030900 in the Progress neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 41067030900?
Median gross rent is $1,652/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 41067030900?
12.0% of residents in tract 41067030900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,636.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 41067030900?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 22th, minority 62th, housing 71th.
Q5
Is tract 41067030900 considered part of Progress?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41067030900 fall within Progress (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41067030900?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 307 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 41067030900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.68% of renter households, peaking at 4.5% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 41067030900 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.65× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 41067030900 compare to Tigard overall?
Tract 41067030900 scores 3.9/10, lower than the parent city of Tigard at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tigard eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Tigard
Top eight tracts in Tigard ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OR
Oak Creek
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OR
Southview
3.7
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OR
Southview
3.4
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OR
Cook Park
3.3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OR
Jack Park
3.1
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OR
Scholls / Summerlake
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OR
Lake Forest
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OR
Progress
2.4
/ 10 · Low
Related