Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally
Hills at Bethel Eviction Risk: Lower , Boothwyn
Tract 42045410401 ·
Delaware County, PA · pop 2,482 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Tract 42045410401 sits in the Hills at Bethel area of Delaware County, PA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.2/10. Population here is 2,482. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 40% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%Stable renters 0%Owners 100%
Tract context
Occupied units803
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate0.4%
Median income$198,162
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33th percentile
#3 of 4 tracts In Hills at Bethel
Low
Within county
25th percentile
#115 of 152 tracts In Delaware County
Low
Within state
25th percentile
#2,601 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Low
National
25th percentile
#63,308 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Boothwyn and the region
Centroid at 39.8556, -75.4734 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hills at Bethel scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Boothwyn
3.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
0.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Boothwyn
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Boothwyn
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Boothwyn
5.0
How Hills at Bethel compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 12
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
22%Socioeconomic
49%Household composition
43%Racial/ethnic minority
3%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hills at Bethel. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.8/10. Against the Delaware County average of 4.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.5 points. That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the PA average is 4.6, so this tract runs 1.4 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
Model confidence here is 40%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point. Poverty sits at 0%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 42045410401
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42045410401?
Census tract 42045410401 in the Hills at Bethel neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 42045410401?
0.4% of residents in tract 42045410401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,482.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 42045410401?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 49th, minority 43th, housing 3th.
Q4
Is tract 42045410401 considered part of Hills at Bethel?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42045410401 fall within Hills at Bethel (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q5
How does tract 42045410401 compare to Boothwyn overall?
Tract 42045410401 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Boothwyn at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Boothwyn; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.