Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Darlington Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pawtucket

Tract 44007015700 · Providence County, RI · pop 3,695 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 44007015700 covers part of the Darlington area of Pawtucket, RI, and scores 5/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,695. 24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 14% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,452
Renter share24.0%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate6.2%
Median income$87,457

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 11 tracts In Darlington
Low
Within parent city
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 21 tracts In Pawtucket
Very Low
Within county
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#86 of 145 tracts In Providence County
Moderate
Within state
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#122 of 247 tracts In Rhode Island
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pawtucket and the region

Centroid at 41.8946, -71.3475 · click any tract to drill in

Why Darlington scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pawtucket
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
6.2% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,354 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pawtucket
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pawtucket
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pawtucket
6.0

How Darlington compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Darlington risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.05.0This tracttract 015700Pawtucket: 5.95.9Pawtucketparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.35.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 29Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 3.70%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.1%Peak (2015)
  • 13Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 80Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.78×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (5.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Darlington. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Darlington

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.6/10. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10.

The filing record is not thin: 29 evictions over 2 years of observation. Against the Providence County average of 5.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points.

Average gross rent is $1,354, 12% above the Pawtucket average. The worst year on record was 2015, when 4.1% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 3.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 61% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 24% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.5/10. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. 40% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $87,457.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 44007015700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007015700?

Census tract 44007015700 in the Darlington neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 44007015700?

Median gross rent is $1,354/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 44007015700?

6.2% of residents in tract 44007015700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,695.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 44007015700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 50th, minority 37th, housing 24th.
Q5

Is tract 44007015700 considered part of Darlington?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007015700 fall within Darlington (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007015700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 29 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007015700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.70% of renter households, peaking at 4.1% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 44007015700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.78× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 44007015700 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 44007015700 compare to Pawtucket overall?

Tract 44007015700 scores 5/10, lower than the parent city of Pawtucket at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pawtucket eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 44007015700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pawtucket

Top eight tracts in Pawtucket ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related