Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Gold Cup Springs Eviction Risk: Lower , Hanahan

Tract 45015021000 · Berkeley County, SC · pop 4,611 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

How risky is the Gold Cup Springs area of Hanahan for landlords? Census tract 45015021000 scores 6.2/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 79% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 45% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,096 monthly, set against $53,279 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 49% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 27% Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units1,947
Renter share49.5%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate17.5%
Median income$53,279

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Gold Cup Springs
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 7 tracts In Hanahan
Very High
Within county
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#9 of 48 tracts In Berkeley County
High
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#706 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hanahan and the region

Centroid at 32.9304, -79.9825 · click any tract to drill in

Why Gold Cup Springs scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hanahan
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
17.5% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$1,096 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hanahan
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hanahan
6.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hanahan
6.9

How Gold Cup Springs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Gold Cup Springs risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 021000Hanahan: 2.32.3Hanahanparent cityCounty: 2.92.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,719Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 32.50%Avg annual filing rate
  • 42.1%Peak (2010)
  • 314Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450150210002010: 415 filings (42.09/100 renter HHs)2011: 393 filings (36.29/100 renter HHs)2012: 323 filings (29.82/100 renter HHs)2013: 274 filings (25.30/100 renter HHs)2014: 314 filings (28.99/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 24% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Gold Cup Springs

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hanahan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Berkeley County average of 5.5 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 95th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,719 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 32.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 42.1% of renter households in 2010.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 45015021000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45015021000?

Census tract 45015021000 in the Gold Cup Springs neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45015021000?

Median gross rent is $1,096/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45015021000?

17.5% of residents in tract 45015021000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,611.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45015021000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 93th, minority 63th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 45015021000 considered part of Gold Cup Springs?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45015021000 fall within Gold Cup Springs (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45015021000?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,719 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45015021000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 32.50% of renter households, peaking at 42.1% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45015021000 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45015021000 compare to Hanahan overall?

Tract 45015021000 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Hanahan at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hanahan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hanahan

Top eight tracts in Hanahan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related