Gold Cup Springs Eviction Risk: Lower , Hanahan
Tract 45015021000 · Berkeley County, SC · pop 4,611 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
How risky is the Gold Cup Springs area of Hanahan for landlords? Census tract 45015021000 scores 6.2/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 79% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 45% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,096 monthly, set against $53,279 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 49% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Hanahan and the region
Centroid at 32.9304, -79.9825 · click any tract to drill in
Why Gold Cup Springs scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Gold Cup Springs compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 79%Socioeconomic
- 93%Household composition
- 63%Racial/ethnic minority
- 98%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,719Total filings over 5 yrs
- 32.50%Avg annual filing rate
- 42.1%Peak (2010)
- 314Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 18.7%Housing insecurity
- 12.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 26.9%Food insecurity
- 16.3%SNAP enrollment
- 12.4%Transit barriers
- 19.1%No health insurance
- 19.1%Frequent mental distress
- 38.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Gold Cup Springs
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hanahan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Berkeley County average of 5.5 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 95th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,719 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 32.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 42.1% of renter households in 2010.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 45015021000
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45015021000?
What is the average rent in tract 45015021000?
What is the poverty rate in tract 45015021000?
How socially vulnerable is tract 45015021000?
Is tract 45015021000 considered part of Gold Cup Springs?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45015021000?
What share of households in tract 45015021000 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 45015021000 compare to Hanahan overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Hanahan
Top eight tracts in Hanahan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.