Stonewood Manor Eviction Risk: Lower , Five Forks
Tract 45045002822 · Greenville County, SC · pop 7,829 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 45045002822 sits in the Stonewood Manor area of Five Forks eviction risk, SC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 7,829 residents. Severe burden reaches 61%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Five Forks and the region
Centroid at 34.8104, -82.1845 · click any tract to drill in
Why Stonewood Manor scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Stonewood Manor compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 11
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 19%Socioeconomic
- 24%Household composition
- 45%Racial/ethnic minority
- 8%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 83Total filings 2020-21
- 1.2Avg monthly (observed)
- 1.2Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.98×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Greenville, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.6%Housing insecurity
- 5.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.1%Food insecurity
- 4.8%SNAP enrollment
- 5.3%Transit barriers
- 8.2%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 22.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Stonewood Manor
Against Greenville County at 45.8%, 63% of renters here are cost-burdened. The dominant input is supply constraint at 10/10. The voucher gap is 64.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
On the high side, court filing pressure reads 9.6/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.6/10.
SNAP participation runs 4.8% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Greenville County average of 4.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.1 points.
Food insecurity runs 10.1% against 17.8% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 3% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
Social vulnerability reads 2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the SC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 45045002822
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45045002822?
What is the average rent in tract 45045002822?
What is the poverty rate in tract 45045002822?
How socially vulnerable is tract 45045002822?
Is tract 45045002822 considered part of Stonewood Manor?
Did eviction filings in tract 45045002822 drop during COVID?
What share of households in tract 45045002822 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 45045002822 compare to Five Forks overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Five Forks
Top eight tracts in Five Forks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.