Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Crestwell Eviction Risk: Lower , Irmo

Tract 45063021113 · Lexington County, SC · pop 3,311 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

In Crestwell in Irmo, census tract 45063021113 scores 4.7/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #60,759 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

22% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $761 a month while the average household earns $68,596 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 16% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,348
Renter share20.8%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate10.8%
Median income$68,596

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Crestwell
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 7 tracts In Irmo
Very High
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#44 of 92 tracts In Lexington County
Moderate
Within state
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#965 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Irmo and the region

Centroid at 34.0905, -81.2005 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crestwell scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Irmo
4.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
10.8% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$761 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irmo
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irmo
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irmo
5.0

How Crestwell compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crestwell risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 021113Irmo: 2.62.6Irmoparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 279Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 15.13%Avg annual filing rate
  • 17.2%Peak (2014)
  • 66Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450630211132010: 49 filings (15.76/100 renter HHs)2011: 58 filings (15.10/100 renter HHs)2012: 57 filings (14.84/100 renter HHs)2013: 49 filings (12.76/100 renter HHs)2014: 66 filings (17.19/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 35% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crestwell

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 5.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Irmo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Lexington County average of 5.3 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 279 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 15.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 17.2% of renter households in 2014.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45063021113

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021113?

Census tract 45063021113 in the Crestwell neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45063021113?

Median gross rent is $761/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 22% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021113?

10.8% of residents in tract 45063021113 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,311.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021113?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 35th, minority 60th, housing 22th.
Q5

Is tract 45063021113 considered part of Crestwell?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021113 fall within Crestwell (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45063021113?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 279 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45063021113 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.13% of renter households, peaking at 17.2% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45063021113 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45063021113 compare to Irmo overall?

Tract 45063021113 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Irmo at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irmo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Irmo

Top eight tracts in Irmo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related