Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Three Points Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbia

Tract 45079000500 · Richland County, SC · pop 1,888 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

With a score of 5.2/10, tract 45079000500 in the Three Points area of Columbia, SC reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,888 residents. What pushes it up most is economic stress at 10/10.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 45% Owners 20%
Tract context
Occupied units825
Renter share80.0%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate41.6%
Median income$36,036

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In Three Points
High
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 53 tracts In Columbia
High
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 98 tracts In Richland County
High
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#163 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbia and the region

Centroid at 34.0325, -81.0314 · click any tract to drill in

Why Three Points scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbia
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
41.6% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$861 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbia
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbia
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbia
3.0

How Three Points compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Three Points risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.2This tracttract 0005003.8Columbiaparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,634Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 55.13%Avg annual filing rate
  • 62.9%Peak (2010)
  • 289Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 45079000500
Filings dropped 21% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Three Points. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Three Points

Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 9.8/10. The poverty rate is 42%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 30.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

80% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.

At $861 a month, rents run 28% under what the rest of Columbia commands. 19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. 44% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Richland County average of 49.7%.

Against the Richland County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points. Adults with no health insurance runs 20.5% against 11.3% nationally. Court records carry 1,634 eviction filings across 5 observed years.

The worst year on record was 2010, when 62.9% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 55.1% of renter households face a filing.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 45079000500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45079000500?

Census tract 45079000500 in the Three Points neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45079000500?

Median gross rent is $861/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45079000500?

41.6% of residents in tract 45079000500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,888.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45079000500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 81th, minority 95th, housing 82th.
Q5

Is tract 45079000500 considered part of Three Points?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45079000500 fall within Three Points (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45079000500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,634 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45079000500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 55.13% of renter households, peaking at 62.9% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45079000500 struggle to pay rent?

About 36.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 30.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45079000500 compare to Columbia overall?

Tract 45079000500 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Columbia at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbia eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbia

Top eight tracts in Columbia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related