Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,912 of 84,120 nationally

Huntington Hills Eviction Risk: Elevated , Camp Croft

Tract 45083022004 · Spartanburg County, SC · pop 2,588 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 45083022004 covers the Huntington Hills area of Camp Croft, home to 2,588 residents. For landlords it grades 7.2/10, an elevated reading. On the national scale it ranks #3,276 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 62% of renter households, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $959 a month while the average household earns $37,799 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 39% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 15% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units974
Renter share39.0%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate38.0%
Median income$37,799

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Huntington Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Camp Croft
Moderate
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 87 tracts In Spartanburg County
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#31 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Camp Croft and the region

Centroid at 34.9088, -81.8636 · click any tract to drill in

Why Huntington Hills scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Camp Croft
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
38.0% poverty · this tract
9.5
Supply constraint
$959 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camp Croft
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camp Croft
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camp Croft
8.9

How Huntington Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Huntington Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.36.3This tracttract 022004Camp Croft: 2.92.9Camp Croftparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 92

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 185Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 59.29%Avg annual filing rate
  • 59.3%Peak (2010)
  • 185Filings in 2010 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Huntington Hills

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 9.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camp Croft, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well above the Spartanburg County average of 5.5 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 185 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 59.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 59.3% of renter households in 2010.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 92nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 45083022004

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45083022004?

Census tract 45083022004 in the Huntington Hills neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45083022004?

Median gross rent is $959/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45083022004?

38.0% of residents in tract 45083022004 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,588.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45083022004?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 98th, minority 74th, housing 42th.
Q5

Is tract 45083022004 considered part of Huntington Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45083022004 fall within Huntington Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45083022004?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 185 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 45083022004 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 59.29% of renter households, peaking at 59.3% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45083022004 struggle to pay rent?

About 23.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45083022004 compare to Camp Croft overall?

Tract 45083022004 scores 6.3/10, higher than the parent city of Camp Croft at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camp Croft; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related