Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally
Glen Forest Eviction Risk: Moderate , Glendale
Tract 45083022102 ·
Spartanburg County, SC · pop 2,141 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 45083022102 (Glen Forest in Glendale, South Carolina) comes in at 5.1/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #49,481 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
45% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $943 monthly, set against $51,250 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 20% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%Stable renters 11%Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units978
Renter share19.9%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate9.7%
Median income$51,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Glen Forest
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Glendale
Moderate
Within county
59th percentile
#36 of 87 tracts In Spartanburg County
Elevated
Within state
67th percentile
#441 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Glendale and the region
Centroid at 34.9466, -81.8249 · click any tract to drill in
Why Glen Forest scores 4.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glendale
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
9.7% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$943 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glendale
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glendale
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glendale
1.3
How Glen Forest compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 32
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
47%Socioeconomic
46%Household composition
14%Racial/ethnic minority
22%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
59Total filings over 1 yrs
30.26%Avg annual filing rate
30.3%Peak (2010)
59Filings in 2010 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.6%Housing insecurity
5.6%Utility-shutoff threat
11.0%Food insecurity
6.1%SNAP enrollment
5.8%Transit barriers
9.1%No health insurance
14.4%Frequent mental distress
32.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Glen Forest
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Glendale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Spartanburg County average of 5.5 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 32nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 45083022102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45083022102?
Census tract 45083022102 in the Glen Forest neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45083022102?
Median gross rent is $943/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45083022102?
9.7% of residents in tract 45083022102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,141.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45083022102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 47th, household 46th, minority 14th, housing 22th.
Q5
Is tract 45083022102 considered part of Glen Forest?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45083022102 fall within Glen Forest (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45083022102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 59 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 45083022102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 30.26% of renter households, peaking at 30.3% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 45083022102 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 45083022102 compare to Glendale overall?
Tract 45083022102 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Glendale at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glendale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.