Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Spring Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Boiling Springs

Tract 45083022406 · Spartanburg County, SC · pop 9,715 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 45083022406 covers Spring Hills in Boiling Springs, home to 9,715 residents. For landlords it grades $1/10, a moderate reading. That is riskier than about 38% of US census tracts.

About 31% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,030 a month against an average household income of $80,625 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 20% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 13% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units3,901
Renter share19.6%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate9.8%
Median income$80,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Spring Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Boiling Springs
Very High
Within county
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#79 of 87 tracts In Spartanburg County
Very Low
Within state
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#1,055 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Boiling Springs and the region

Centroid at 35.0323, -81.9748 · click any tract to drill in

Why Spring Hills scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Boiling Springs
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
9.8% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,030 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Boiling Springs
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Boiling Springs
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Boiling Springs
4.1

How Spring Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Spring Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 022406Boiling Springs: 2.32.3Boiling Springsparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 150Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 19.82%Avg annual filing rate
  • 19.8%Peak (2010)
  • 150Filings in 2010 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Spring Hills

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 5.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Boiling Springs eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Spartanburg County average of 5.5 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 150 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 19.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 19.8% of renter households in 2010.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45083022406

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45083022406?

Census tract 45083022406 in the Spring Hills neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45083022406?

Median gross rent is $1,030/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45083022406?

9.8% of residents in tract 45083022406 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 9,715.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45083022406?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 74th, minority 44th, housing 43th.
Q5

Is tract 45083022406 considered part of Spring Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45083022406 fall within Spring Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45083022406?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 150 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 45083022406 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 19.82% of renter households, peaking at 19.8% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45083022406 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45083022406 compare to Boiling Springs overall?

Tract 45083022406 scores 2.7/10, higher than the parent city of Boiling Springs at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Boiling Springs eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Boiling Springs

Top eight tracts in Boiling Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related