Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Spring Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Boiling Springs

Tract 45083022406 · Spartanburg County, SC · pop 9,715 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

45083022406 is a census tract in the Spring Hills area of Boiling Springs, SC. It scores 3/10 for landlords. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.8/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 13% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units3,901
Renter share19.6%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate9.8%
Median income$80,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Spring Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Boiling Springs
Very High
Within county
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#82 of 87 tracts In Spartanburg County
Very Low
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#932 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Boiling Springs and the region

Centroid at 35.0323, -81.9748 · click any tract to drill in

Why Spring Hills scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Boiling Springs
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
9.8% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,030 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Boiling Springs
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Boiling Springs
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Boiling Springs
4.1

How Spring Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Spring Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0224063.4Boiling Springsparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 150Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 19.82%Avg annual filing rate
  • 19.8%Peak (2010)
  • 150Filings in 2010 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Spring Hills

Against Spartanburg County at 42.3%, 31% of renters here are cost-burdened. 18% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.1/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.3/10. Average gross rent is $1,030, 19% below the Boiling Springs average.

Against the Spartanburg County average of 4.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points. The filing record is not thin: 150 evictions over 1 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2010 at 19.8% of renter households. In a typical year about 19.8% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.7/10.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 45083022406

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45083022406?

Census tract 45083022406 in the Spring Hills neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45083022406?

Median gross rent is $1,030/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45083022406?

9.8% of residents in tract 45083022406 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 9,715.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45083022406?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 74th, minority 44th, housing 43th.
Q5

Is tract 45083022406 considered part of Spring Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45083022406 fall within Spring Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45083022406?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 150 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 45083022406 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 19.82% of renter households, peaking at 19.8% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45083022406 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45083022406 compare to Boiling Springs overall?

Tract 45083022406 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Boiling Springs at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Boiling Springs eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Boiling Springs

Top eight tracts in Boiling Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related