Traemoor Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Reidville

What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.8/10. The voucher gap is 47.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Running hot, supply constraint reads 9.7/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. The severe-burden share is 18%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

SNAP participation runs 5.7% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Spartanburg County average of 4.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points.

Against Spartanburg County at 42.3%, 38% of renters here are cost-burdened. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 6% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the SC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.