About 31% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,362 a month while the average household earns $76,888 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 18%Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units3,029
Renter share26.9%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$76,888
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Brookside Villages
Moderate
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 4 tracts In White House
Very High
Within county
57th percentile
#7 of 15 tracts In Robertson County
Elevated
Within state
16th percentile
#1,428 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across White House and the region
Centroid at 36.4687, -86.6843 · click any tract to drill in
Why Brookside Villages scores 2.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from White House
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.7
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,362 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from White House
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from White House
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from White House
4.0
How Brookside Villages compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
31%Socioeconomic
39%Household composition
14%Racial/ethnic minority
24%Housing & transportation
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Brookside Villages
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from White House eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Robertson County average of 4.1 and below the Tennessee statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 47147080103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47147080103?
Census tract 47147080103 in the Brookside Villages neighborhood scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47147080103?
Median gross rent is $1,362/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47147080103?
6.9% of residents in tract 47147080103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,449.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47147080103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 39th, minority 14th, housing 24th.
Q5
Is tract 47147080103 considered part of Brookside Villages?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 47147080103 fall within Brookside Villages (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 47147080103 compare to White House overall?
Tract 47147080103 scores 2.5/10, higher than the parent city of White House at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from White House eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in White House
Top eight tracts in White House ranked by composite eviction-risk score.