Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally
Brookside Villages Eviction Risk: Lower , White House
Tract 47147080103 · Robertson County, TN · pop 7,449 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 47147080103 covers part of the Brookside Villages area of White House, TN, and scores 3.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.7/10.
Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units3,029
Renter share26.9%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$76,888
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
64
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
34
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across White House and the region
Centroid at 36.4687, -86.6843 · click any tract to drill in
Why Brookside Villages scores 3.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from White House
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.7
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,362 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from White House
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from White House
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from White House
4.0
How Brookside Villages compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 31%Socioeconomic
- 39%Household composition
- 14%Racial/ethnic minority
- 24%Housing & transportation
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Brookside Villages
Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.8/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.9/10.
12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. It sits 0.6 points below the Robertson County average of 3.7.
That is riskier than roughly 22% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 3.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
Rent takes 30% or more of income for 31% of renters. Average gross rent is $1,362, close to the White House average.
Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $76,888. 27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 47147080103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47147080103?
Census tract 47147080103 in the Brookside Villages neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47147080103?
Median gross rent is $1,362/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47147080103?
6.9% of residents in tract 47147080103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,449.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47147080103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 39th, minority 14th, housing 24th.
Q5
Is tract 47147080103 considered part of Brookside Villages?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 47147080103 fall within Brookside Villages (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 47147080103 compare to White House overall?
Tract 47147080103 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of White House at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from White House eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in White House
Top eight tracts in White House ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related