Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Census Tract · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally
White House Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 47165020405 · Sumner County, TN · pop 2,136 · 37% of tract blocks fall in White House
The Lower-tier score of 3.5/10 for census tract 47165020405 reflects conditions in White House, Tennessee. That is riskier than about 5% of US census tracts.
About 21% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,409 a month while the average household earns $73,452 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 41% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 33%
Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units946
Renter share41.0%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$73,452
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
29
th percentile
Low
Within state
13
th percentile
Very Low
National
17
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across White House and the region
Centroid at 36.4963, -86.6276 · click any tract to drill in
Why White House scores 2.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from White House
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,409 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from White House
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from White House
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from White House
4.0
How White House compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 34%Socioeconomic
- 35%Household composition
- 8%Racial/ethnic minority
- 31%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in White House
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 5.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from White House eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Sumner County average of 4.3 and below the Tennessee statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 47165020405
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47165020405?
Census tract 47165020405 in White House scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47165020405?
Median gross rent is $1,409/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47165020405?
3.6% of residents in tract 47165020405 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,136.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47165020405?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 35th, minority 8th, housing 31th.
Q5
How does tract 47165020405 compare to White House overall?
Tract 47165020405 scores 2.3/10, right in line with the parent city of White House at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from White House eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in White House
Top eight tracts in White House ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related