Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

Medical District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Memphis

Tract 47157003700 · Shelby County, TN · pop 1,203 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Tract 47157003700, home to 1,203 residents in Medical District in Memphis, scores 5.4/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 52nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

46% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $763 a month while the average household earns $22,650 a year, roughly 40% of income at the averages. Renters make up 100% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 54% Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units790
Renter share99.6%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate41.4%
Median income$22,650

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Medical District
High
Within parent city
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#45 of 197 tracts In Memphis
High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#50 of 249 tracts In Shelby County
High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#170 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Memphis and the region

Centroid at 35.1356, -90.0280 · click any tract to drill in

Why Medical District scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Memphis
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
41.4% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$763 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Memphis
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Memphis
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Memphis
4.5

How Medical District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Medical District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 003700Memphis: 3.13.1Memphisparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 459Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 7.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.81×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 9 filings (1.57× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2020-04-01: 3 filings (0.30× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-07-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2020-09-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-10-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 6 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.52× baseline)2021-03-01: 13 filings (1.18× baseline)2021-04-01: 9 filings (0.90× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.28× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-08-01: 16 filings (2.46× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2022-03-01: 15 filings (1.36× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2022-06-01: 6 filings (0.65× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2022-08-01: 8 filings (1.23× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-11-01: 7 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-12-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 18 filings (2.12× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (1.04× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (0.36× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-05-01: 4 filings (0.37× baseline)2023-06-01: 6 filings (0.65× baseline)2023-07-01: 38 filings (5.63× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-09-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2023-10-01: 13 filings (1.86× baseline)2023-11-01: 11 filings (1.42× baseline)2023-12-01: 11 filings (2.44× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2024-02-01: 6 filings (1.04× baseline)2024-03-01: 7 filings (0.64× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2024-07-01: 20 filings (2.96× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-11-01: 8 filings (1.03× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-01-01: 11 filings (1.29× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.52× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (0.76× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (0.74× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-09-01: 8 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2026-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Memphis, TN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Medical District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Medical District

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Memphis eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Shelby County average of 4.9 and above the Tennessee statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 97th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 47157003700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47157003700?

Census tract 47157003700 in the Medical District neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 47157003700?

Median gross rent is $763/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 47157003700?

41.4% of residents in tract 47157003700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,203.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 47157003700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 53th, minority 82th, housing 99th.
Q5

Is tract 47157003700 considered part of Medical District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 47157003700 fall within Medical District (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 47157003700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.81× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Memphis eviction risk, TN), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 47157003700 compare to Memphis overall?

Tract 47157003700 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Memphis at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Memphis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 47157003700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Memphis

Top eight tracts in Memphis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related