Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,912 of 84,120 nationally

Camelot Eviction Risk: Elevated , College Station

Tract 48041001606 · Brazos, TX · pop 2,892 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

How risky is the Camelot area of College Station for landlords? Census tract 48041001606 scores $1/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 37% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 58% of renter households, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,028 monthly, set against $37,228 in average yearly household income, roughly 33% of income at the averages. Renters make up 94% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 54% Stable renters 39% Owners 7%
Tract context
Occupied units1,377
Renter share93.8%
SVI overall0.66
Poverty rate29.0%
Median income$37,228

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Camelot
Very Low
Within parent city
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 33 tracts In College Station
Elevated
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 63 tracts In Brazos
Elevated
Within state
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#266 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across College Station and the region

Centroid at 30.6058, -96.3167 · click any tract to drill in

Why Camelot scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from College Station
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
29.0% poverty · this tract
7.3
Supply constraint
$1,028 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from College Station
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from College Station
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from College Station
3.0

How Camelot compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Camelot risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.36.3This tracttract 001606College Station: 3.03.0College Stationparent cityCounty: 5.05.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 66

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 25Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 1.29%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.4%Peak (2005)
  • 11Filings in 2007 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Camelot. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Camelot

What moves this score most is economic stress at 7.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from College Station eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Brazos County average of 5.1 and in line with the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 66th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 25 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 1.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.4% of renter households in 2005.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48041001606

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48041001606?

Census tract 48041001606 in the Camelot neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48041001606?

Median gross rent is $1,028/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48041001606?

29.0% of residents in tract 48041001606 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,892.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48041001606?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 66th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 15th, minority 62th, housing 79th.
Q5

Is tract 48041001606 considered part of Camelot?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48041001606 fall within Camelot (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48041001606?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 25 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 48041001606 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.29% of renter households, peaking at 1.4% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 48041001606 compare to College Station overall?

Tract 48041001606 scores 6.3/10, higher than the parent city of College Station at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from College Station eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in College Station

Top eight tracts in College Station ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related