Census Tract · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally
Kingsbury Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48187210903 ·
Guadalupe, TX · pop 1,647 · 14% of tract blocks fall in Kingsbury
Census tract 48187210903 sits in Kingsbury, Texas eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of $1/10. That is riskier than roughly 2% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
15% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,119 a month against an average household income of $67,188 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%Stable renters 5%Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units607
Renter share6.4%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$67,188
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Kingsbury
Moderate
Within county
73th percentile
#12 of 41 tracts In Guadalupe
Elevated
Within state
48th percentile
#3,559 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Moderate
National
47th percentile
#44,543 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Kingsbury and the region
Centroid at 29.6185, -97.7414 · click any tract to drill in
Why Kingsbury scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kingsbury
4.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.8
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,119 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kingsbury
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kingsbury
3.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kingsbury
1.0
How Kingsbury compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 64
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 3.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Kingsbury, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Guadalupe County average of 4.2 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 48187210903
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48187210903?
Census tract 48187210903 in Kingsbury scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48187210903?
Median gross rent is $1,119/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48187210903?
8.6% of residents in tract 48187210903 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,647.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48187210903?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 47th, household 81th, minority 49th, housing 67th.
Q5
How does tract 48187210903 compare to Kingsbury overall?
Tract 48187210903 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Kingsbury at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kingsbury; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.