Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #66,104 of 84,120 nationally

Fairmont Park West Eviction Risk: Lower , La Porte

Tract 48201343100 · Harris, TX · pop 4,058 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 48201343100 covers the Fairmont Park West area of La Porte in Texas. Home to 4,058 residents, it scores 5.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #43,721 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 34% of renter households, a high level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,684 a month against an average household income of $99,435 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 11% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 7% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,410
Renter share10.9%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate6.1%
Median income$99,435

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 1 tracts In Fairmont Park West
Moderate
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileBottomTop
#7 of 9 tracts In La Porte
Low
Within county
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileBottomTop
#533 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
Moderate
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileBottomTop
#2,470 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across La Porte and the region

Centroid at 29.6588, -95.0784 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fairmont Park West scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from La Porte
2.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.1% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,684 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from La Porte
8.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from La Porte
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from La Porte
7.4

How Fairmont Park West compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fairmont Park West risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 343100La Porte: 3.53.5La Porteparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 26

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000-2018)

  • 229Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 11.42%Avg annual filing rate
  • 28.6%Peak (2009)
  • 31Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482013431002009: 64 filings (28.57/100 renter HHs)2010: 35 filings (10.09/100 renter HHs)2011: 23 filings (7.30/100 renter HHs)2012: 30 filings (9.52/100 renter HHs)2013: 23 filings (7.30/100 renter HHs)2014: 23 filings (7.30/100 renter HHs)2015: 31 filings (9.84/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 52% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020-2021)

  • 82Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.56×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020-2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (3.43× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fairmont Park West

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from La Porte, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Harris County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.56x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 229 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 11.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 28.6% of renter households in 2009.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201343100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201343100?

Census tract 48201343100 in the Fairmont Park West neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201343100?

Median gross rent is $1,684/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201343100?

6.1% of residents in tract 48201343100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,058.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201343100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 37th, minority 65th, housing 11th.

Q5

Is tract 48201343100 considered part of Fairmont Park West?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201343100 fall within Fairmont Park West (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201343100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 229 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201343100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.42% of renter households, peaking at 28.6% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201343100 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.56× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.

Q8

How does tract 48201343100 compare to La Porte overall?

Tract 48201343100 scores 2.9/10, lower than the parent city of La Porte at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from La Porte; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in La Porte

Top eight tracts in La Porte ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related