Census Tract · Ranked #28,017 of 84,120 nationally
Eustace Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 48213950500 ·
Henderson County, TX · pop 3,216 · 41% of tract blocks fall in Eustace
Census tract 48213950500 sits in Eustace, Texas eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.1/10. That is riskier than about 41% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 35% of renter households, a high level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $878 a month against an average household income of $61,333 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%Stable renters 18%Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,048
Renter share27.5%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate17.8%
Median income$61,333
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Eustace
Moderate
Within county
82th percentile
#6 of 28 tracts In Henderson County
High
Within state
70th percentile
#2,060 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
National
67th percentile
#28,017 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Eustace and the region
Centroid at 32.3248, -96.0121 · click any tract to drill in
Why Eustace scores 4.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Eustace
2.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
17.8% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$878 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Eustace
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Eustace
8.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Eustace
7.2
How Eustace compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 87
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Eustace, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Henderson County average of 4.8 and in line with the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 87th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48213950500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48213950500?
Census tract 48213950500 in Eustace scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48213950500?
Median gross rent is $878/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48213950500?
17.8% of residents in tract 48213950500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,216.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48213950500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 93th, minority 32th, housing 80th.
Q5
How does tract 48213950500 compare to Eustace overall?
Tract 48213950500 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Eustace at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Eustace; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.