Census Tract · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally
Deerwood Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48339693001 ·
Montgomery, TX · pop 5,842 · 28% of tract blocks fall in Deerwood
Eviction risk in Deerwood centers on tract 48339693001, which scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier) and is home to 5,842 residents. That is riskier than roughly 3% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 8% of renter households, a modest level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $884 a month while the average household earns $55,210 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 22% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 21%Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,848
Renter share22.5%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate11.6%
Median income$55,210
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Deerwood
Moderate
Within county
71th percentile
#39 of 133 tracts In Montgomery
Elevated
Within state
38th percentile
#4,301 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
37th percentile
#53,267 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Deerwood and the region
Centroid at 30.2952, -95.2712 · click any tract to drill in
Why Deerwood scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Deerwood
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.6% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$884 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Deerwood
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Deerwood
4.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Deerwood
1.0
How Deerwood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 60
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 4.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Deerwood, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Montgomery County average of 4.8 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 60th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 48339693001
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48339693001?
Census tract 48339693001 in Deerwood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48339693001?
Median gross rent is $884/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 8% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48339693001?
11.6% of residents in tract 48339693001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,842.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48339693001?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 53th, minority 72th, housing 47th.
Q5
How does tract 48339693001 compare to Deerwood overall?
Tract 48339693001 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Deerwood at 1.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Deerwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.