Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 48339694305 Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48339694305 · Montgomery, TX · pop 5,182

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 48339694305 (Montgomery, Texas) comes in at 4.3/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 17% of US census tracts.

About 29% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,678 a month while the average household earns $77,500 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. Renters make up 23% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 17% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units2,096
Renter share23.3%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$77,500

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 133 tracts In Montgomery
Elevated
Within state
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#5,145 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,481 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Montgomery and the region

Centroid at 30.3979, -95.6055 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 48339694305 scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
1.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,678 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
State baseline
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 48339694305 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 48339694305 risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 694305County: 2.72.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 16

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 48339694305

What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Texas eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Montgomery County average of 4.8 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 16th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48339694305

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48339694305?

Census tract 48339694305 in Montgomery scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48339694305?

Median gross rent is $1,678/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48339694305?

6.5% of residents in tract 48339694305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,182.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48339694305?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 6th, minority 19th, housing 59th.
Related