Within neighborhood
20
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally
Como Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Worth
Tract 48439105405 · Tarrant, TX · pop 5,547 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 48439105405 (Como in Fort Worth, Texas) comes in at 4.9/10, the Moderate tier. It lands near the 34th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 44% of renter households, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,617 a month against an average household income of $81,813 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 72% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32%
Stable renters 40%
Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units2,771
Renter share71.6%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate10.0%
Median income$81,813
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
39
th percentile
Low
Within county
55
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
38
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fort Worth and the region
Centroid at 32.7006, -97.4016 · click any tract to drill in
Why Como scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fort Worth
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
10.0% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,617 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Worth
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Worth
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Worth
2.5
How Como compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 38
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 43%Socioeconomic
- 29%Household composition
- 49%Racial/ethnic minority
- 38%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,798Total filings over 17 yrs
- 6.82%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.8%Peak (2011)
- 101Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 71% over the past 17 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 2,333Total filings 2020-21
- 30.3Avg monthly (observed)
- 14.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 2.17×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Como. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Como
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 4.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fort Worth eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Tarrant County average of 5.1 and in line with the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 2.17x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 38th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48439105405
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439105405?
Census tract 48439105405 in the Como neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48439105405?
Median gross rent is $1,617/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48439105405?
10.0% of residents in tract 48439105405 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,547.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48439105405?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 43th, household 29th, minority 49th, housing 38th.
Q5
Is tract 48439105405 considered part of Como?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48439105405 fall within Como (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439105405?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,798 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439105405 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.82% of renter households, peaking at 11.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 48439105405 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 2.17× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 48439105405 compare to Fort Worth overall?
Tract 48439105405 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Fort Worth at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Worth eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 48439105405 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fort Worth
Top eight tracts in Fort Worth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · TX
48439105201
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · TX
48439105902
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · TX
48439106520
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · TX
48439105207
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · TX
48439104504
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · TX
48439104505
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · TX
48439105204
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · TX
48439100505
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Related