Within neighborhood
40
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally
Como Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Worth
Tract 48439105405 · Tarrant, TX · pop 5,547 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Census tract 48439105405 covers part of the Como area of Fort Worth, TX, and scores 3.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,547 residents. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32%
Stable renters 40%
Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units2,771
Renter share71.6%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate10.0%
Median income$81,813
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
42
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
45
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
45
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fort Worth and the region
Centroid at 32.7006, -97.4016 · click any tract to drill in
Why Como scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fort Worth
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
10.0% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,617 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Worth
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Worth
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Worth
2.5
How Como compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 38
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 43%Socioeconomic
- 29%Household composition
- 49%Racial/ethnic minority
- 38%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,798Total filings over 17 yrs
- 6.82%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.8%Peak (2011)
- 101Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 71% over the past 17 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 2,333Total filings 2020-21
- 30.3Avg monthly (observed)
- 14.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 2.17×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Como. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Como
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.6/10. This is renter territory: 72% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Cost burden runs 44% here against 50.2% across Tarrant County.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,798 filings here across 17 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2011 at 11.8% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 6.8% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 29% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.4/10.
It tracks the Tarrant County average of 3.8 closely. Average gross rent is $1,617, close to the Fort Worth average.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 48439105405
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439105405?
Census tract 48439105405 in the Como neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48439105405?
Median gross rent is $1,617/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48439105405?
10.0% of residents in tract 48439105405 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,547.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48439105405?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 43th, household 29th, minority 49th, housing 38th.
Q5
Is tract 48439105405 considered part of Como?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48439105405 fall within Como (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439105405?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,798 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439105405 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.82% of renter households, peaking at 11.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 48439105405 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 2.17× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 48439105405 compare to Fort Worth overall?
Tract 48439105405 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Fort Worth at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Worth eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 48439105405 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fort Worth
Top eight tracts in Fort Worth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · TX
48439104802
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439106600
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
Fort Worth Stockyards National Historic District
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439102301
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439106503
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439104803
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439123100
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
Fort Worth Stockyards National Historic District
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Related