Within neighborhood
20
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally
Como Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Worth
Tract 48439102602 · Tarrant, TX · pop 3,244 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
With a score of 3.3/10, tract 48439102602 in the Como area of Fort Worth, TX reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,244. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units1,426
Renter share38.6%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate8.2%
Median income$79,537
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
39
th percentile
Low
Within county
43
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
43
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fort Worth and the region
Centroid at 32.7304, -97.3814 · click any tract to drill in
Why Como scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fort Worth
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
8.2% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,403 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Worth
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Worth
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Worth
2.5
How Como compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 85%Socioeconomic
- 20%Household composition
- 72%Racial/ethnic minority
- 40%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 30%Grade B
- 16%Grade C
- 36%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 554Total filings over 17 yrs
- 4.36%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.9%Peak (2008)
- 28Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 15% over the past 17 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 212Total filings 2020-21
- 2.8Avg monthly (observed)
- 1.8Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.54×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Como. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Como
The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.6/10.
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Against Tarrant County at 50.2%, 57% of renters here are cost-burdened. The filing record is not thin: 554 evictions over 17 years of observation.
Filings peaked in 2008 at 4.9% of renter households. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Fort Worth. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 4.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 27% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.7/10. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Tarrant County average of 3.8 closely.
Average gross rent is $1,403, close to the Fort Worth average.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 48439102602
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439102602?
Census tract 48439102602 in the Como neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48439102602?
Median gross rent is $1,403/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48439102602?
8.2% of residents in tract 48439102602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,244.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48439102602?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 20th, minority 72th, housing 40th.
Q5
Is tract 48439102602 considered part of Como?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48439102602 fall within Como (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439102602?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 554 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439102602 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.36% of renter households, peaking at 4.9% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 48439102602 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.54× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 48439102602 compare to Fort Worth overall?
Tract 48439102602 scores 3.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Fort Worth at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Worth eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 48439102602 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 36% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fort Worth
Top eight tracts in Fort Worth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · TX
48439123100
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
Fort Worth Stockyards National Historic District
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
Wedgwood
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439102302
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439105706
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439104301
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
Wedgwood
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439105901
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Related