Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally
Clarkston Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49005000102 · Cache, UT · pop 1,555 · 18% of tract blocks fall in Clarkston
Here is how census tract 49005000102, in Clarkston, looks to a landlord: a 2.2/10 eviction-risk score (Lower tier) across a population of 1,555. That ranks it among the lowest-risk tracts in the country for landlords, near the bottom 1% nationally.
About 12% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $717 monthly, set against $71,210 in average yearly household income, roughly 12% of income at the averages. Renters make up 12% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units560
Renter share12.3%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate6.3%
Median income$71,210
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
44
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
61
th percentile
Elevated
National
23
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Clarkston and the region
Centroid at 41.9671, -112.0093 · click any tract to drill in
Why Clarkston scores 2.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Clarkston
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
6.3% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$717 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Clarkston
5.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Clarkston
2.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Clarkston
4.6
How Clarkston compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 15
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 18%Socioeconomic
- 63%Household composition
- 8%Racial/ethnic minority
- 10%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 5Total filings over 5 yrs
- 1.47%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.5%Peak (2009)
- 1Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.4%Housing insecurity
- 6.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.6%Food insecurity
- 5.9%SNAP enrollment
- 6.5%Transit barriers
- 9.2%No health insurance
- 16.3%Frequent mental distress
- 28.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Clarkston
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 5.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Clarkston, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Cache County average of 3.6 and below the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 15th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 49005000102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49005000102?
Census tract 49005000102 in Clarkston scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49005000102?
Median gross rent is $717/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 12% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49005000102?
6.3% of residents in tract 49005000102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,555.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49005000102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 63th, minority 8th, housing 10th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49005000102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 5 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 49005000102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.47% of renter households, peaking at 1.5% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 49005000102 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49005000102 compare to Clarkston overall?
Tract 49005000102 scores 2.6/10, higher than the parent city of Clarkston at 1.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Clarkston; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related