Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Newton Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49005000301 ·
Cache, UT · pop 2,426 · 23% of tract blocks fall in Newton
Tract 49005000301 sits in Newton, UT, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Population here is 2,426. The main counterweight is court filing pressure at 0.9/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%Stable renters 9%Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units661
Renter share13.5%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$90,272
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Newton
Moderate
Within county
7th percentile
#26 of 28 tracts In Cache
Very Low
Within state
41th percentile
#425 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Newton and the region
Centroid at 41.8334, -111.9565 · click any tract to drill in
Why Newton scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Newton
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,354 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Newton
1.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Newton
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Newton
1.9
How Newton compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.0%Housing insecurity
5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
10.1%Food insecurity
5.5%SNAP enrollment
6.1%Transit barriers
8.7%No health insurance
15.9%Frequent mental distress
28.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Newton
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.3/10.
SNAP participation runs 5.5% against 15.2% nationally. Cost burden runs around a third here against 37.0% across Cache County.
The voucher gap is 15.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Against the Cache County average of 3.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points.
Food insecurity runs 10.1% against 17.8% nationally. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
At 13% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.6/10. Against average income of $90,272, annual rent is just 18%.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 49005000301
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49005000301?
Census tract 49005000301 in Newton scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49005000301?
Median gross rent is $1,354/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49005000301?
2.2% of residents in tract 49005000301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,426.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49005000301?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 44th, minority 6th, housing 25th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 49005000301 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 49005000301 compare to Newton overall?
Tract 49005000301 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Newton at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Newton; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.