Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Fruit Heights Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49011125102 · Davis, UT · pop 4,207 · 46% of tract blocks fall in Fruit Heights
Tract 49011125102 sits in Fruit Heights, UT, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,484
Renter share10.9%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate2.1%
Median income$145,063
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
15
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
41
th percentile
Moderate
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fruit Heights and the region
Centroid at 41.0738, -111.8737 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fruit Heights scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fruit Heights
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
2.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,550 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fruit Heights
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fruit Heights
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fruit Heights
3.2
How Fruit Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 4
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 19%Household composition
- 4%Racial/ethnic minority
- 20%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 9Total filings over 5 yrs
- 1.67%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.7%Peak (2014)
- 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.7%Housing insecurity
- 3.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.1%Food insecurity
- 2.9%SNAP enrollment
- 4.2%Transit barriers
- 5.9%No health insurance
- 14.7%Frequent mental distress
- 24.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fruit Heights
Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.5/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.9/10. Food insecurity runs 6.1% against 17.8% nationally.
At $1,550 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of Fruit Heights commands. Court records carry 9 eviction filings across 5 observed years.
Against the Davis County average of 3.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.6 points. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
The worst year on record was 2014, when 2.7% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.7% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 11% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.4/10. Against average income of $145,063, annual rent is just 13%.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 49011125102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125102?
Census tract 49011125102 in Fruit Heights scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49011125102?
Median gross rent is $1,550/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125102?
2.1% of residents in tract 49011125102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,207.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 19th, minority 4th, housing 20th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011125102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 9 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 49011125102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.67% of renter households, peaking at 2.7% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 49011125102 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49011125102 compare to Fruit Heights overall?
Tract 49011125102 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Fruit Heights at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fruit Heights; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related