Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Clinton Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 49011125305 · Davis, UT · pop 6,460

Census tract 49011125305 covers part of Clinton, UT, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,460 residents. 10% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Davis County average of 38.9%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 12% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units2,001
Renter share13.9%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$110,596

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Clinton
Low
Within county
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#49 of 66 tracts In Davis
Low
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#425 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Clinton and the region

Centroid at 41.1326, -112.0501 · click any tract to drill in

Why Clinton scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Clinton
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,744 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Clinton
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Clinton
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Clinton
3.7

How Clinton compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Clinton risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 1253053.2Clintonparent city3.6Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 47Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 2.50%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.6%Peak (2014)
  • 5Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 49011125305
Filings climbed 67% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Clinton

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.2/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.5/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.9/10.

SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally. 10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The filing record is not thin: 47 evictions over 7 years of observation.

The voucher gap is 13.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Food insecurity runs 10.2% against 17.8% nationally.

It sits 0.6 points below the Davis County average of 3.6. The worst year on record was 2014, when 4.6% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 2.5% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.9/10.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011125305

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125305?

Census tract 49011125305 in Clinton scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49011125305?

Median gross rent is $1,744/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 10% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125305?

4.7% of residents in tract 49011125305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,460.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125305?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 23th, minority 38th, housing 11th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011125305?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 47 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011125305 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.50% of renter households, peaking at 4.6% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 49011125305 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 49011125305 compare to Clinton overall?

Tract 49011125305 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Clinton at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Clinton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Clinton

Top eight tracts in Clinton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related