Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Greyhawk Patio PRUD Eviction Risk: Lower , South Weber
Tract 49011125103 · Davis, UT · pop 7,058 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
49011125103 is a census tract in the Greyhawk Patio PRUD area of South Weber, UT. It scores 3.8/10 for landlords. It is home to 7,058 residents. Average gross rent is $1,977, 35% above the South Weber average.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 14%
Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units2,362
Renter share21.8%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate9.4%
Median income$97,344
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
72
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
66
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across South Weber and the region
Centroid at 41.1248, -111.9427 · click any tract to drill in
Why Greyhawk Patio PRUD scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from South Weber
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
9.4% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,977 rent vs county FMR
7.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from South Weber
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from South Weber
2.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from South Weber
2.6
How Greyhawk Patio PRUD compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 13
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 13%Socioeconomic
- 19%Household composition
- 33%Racial/ethnic minority
- 26%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 25Total filings over 7 yrs
- 1.43%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.2%Peak (2011)
- 2Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.5%Housing insecurity
- 6.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.7%Food insecurity
- 6.0%SNAP enrollment
- 6.6%Transit barriers
- 8.8%No health insurance
- 18.3%Frequent mental distress
- 27.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Greyhawk Patio PRUD
The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The voucher gap is 29.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Pulling hardest the other way is state political climate at 1.9/10. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10.
On the high side, supply constraint reads 7.9/10. SNAP participation runs 6.0% against 15.2% nationally.
Cost burden runs 34% here against 38.9% across Davis County. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 25 filings here across 7 tracked years. Food insecurity runs 10.7% against 17.8% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2011, when 2.2% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.4% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 38th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 49011125103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125103?
Census tract 49011125103 in the Greyhawk Patio PRUD neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49011125103?
Median gross rent is $1,977/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125103?
9.4% of residents in tract 49011125103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,058.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 19th, minority 33th, housing 26th.
Q5
Is tract 49011125103 considered part of Greyhawk Patio PRUD?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49011125103 fall within Greyhawk Patio PRUD (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011125103?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 25 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011125103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.43% of renter households, peaking at 2.2% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 49011125103 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 49011125103 compare to South Weber overall?
Tract 49011125103 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of South Weber at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from South Weber; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in South Weber
Top eight tracts in South Weber ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related