Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Greyhawk Patio PRUD Eviction Risk: Lower , South Weber

Tract 49011125103 · Davis, UT · pop 7,058 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

For landlords sizing up the Greyhawk Patio PRUD area of South Weber, census tract 49011125103 carries a lower eviction-risk score of 3.8/10. That is riskier than roughly 8% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

34% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,977 monthly, set against $97,344 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 14% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units2,362
Renter share21.8%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate9.4%
Median income$97,344

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Greyhawk Patio PRUD
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In South Weber
Very High
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 66 tracts In Davis
Elevated
Within state
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#369 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across South Weber and the region

Centroid at 41.1248, -111.9427 · click any tract to drill in

Why Greyhawk Patio PRUD scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from South Weber
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
9.4% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,977 rent vs county FMR
7.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from South Weber
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from South Weber
2.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from South Weber
2.6

How Greyhawk Patio PRUD compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Greyhawk Patio PRUD risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 125103South Weber: 2.02.0South Weberparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 25Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 1.43%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.2%Peak (2011)
  • 2Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 490111251032006: 2 filings (0.93/100 renter HHs)2009: 2 filings (0.93/100 renter HHs)2011: 5 filings (2.24/100 renter HHs)2014: 5 filings (2.24/100 renter HHs)2015: 4 filings (1.79/100 renter HHs)2016: 5 filings (1.35/100 renter HHs)2018: 2 filings (0.54/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Greyhawk Patio PRUD

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 7.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from South Weber, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Davis County average of 4.0 and in line with the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 13th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011125103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125103?

Census tract 49011125103 in the Greyhawk Patio PRUD neighborhood scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49011125103?

Median gross rent is $1,977/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125103?

9.4% of residents in tract 49011125103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,058.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 19th, minority 33th, housing 26th.
Q5

Is tract 49011125103 considered part of Greyhawk Patio PRUD?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49011125103 fall within Greyhawk Patio PRUD (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011125103?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 25 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011125103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.43% of renter households, peaking at 2.2% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49011125103 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49011125103 compare to South Weber overall?

Tract 49011125103 scores 2.2/10, right in line with the parent city of South Weber at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from South Weber; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in South Weber

Top eight tracts in South Weber ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related