Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #78,212 of 84,120 nationally

Cameron Bay Eviction Risk: Lower , Brandermill

Tract 51041101013 · Chesterfield County, VA · pop 3,881 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Tract 51041101013, home to 3,881 residents in the Cameron Bay neighborhood of Brandermill, scores 4.4/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 19% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 0% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $142,611 a year. Renters make up 2% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.6
Lower
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 2% Owners 98%
Tract context
Occupied units1,338
Renter share2.4%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate6.2%
Median income$142,611

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Cameron Bay
Very Low
Within county
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 75 tracts In Chesterfield County
Low
Within state
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#1,644 of 2,186 tracts In Virginia
Low
National
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#78,212 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Brandermill and the region

Centroid at 37.3956, -77.6264 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cameron Bay scores 1.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brandermill
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Virginia legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
6.2% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brandermill
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brandermill
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brandermill
5.0

How Cameron Bay compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cameron Bay risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.61.6This tracttract 101013Brandermill: 3.33.3Brandermillparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.03.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 3

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 26Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 12.48%Avg annual filing rate
  • 20.7%Peak (2011)
  • 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 510411010132010: 1 filings (2.50/100 renter HHs)2011: 6 filings (20.69/100 renter HHs)2012: 5 filings (17.24/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (13.79/100 renter HHs)2014: 5 filings (17.24/100 renter HHs)2015: 3 filings (10.34/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (5.56/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 100% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cameron Bay. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cameron Bay

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Brandermill, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Chesterfield County average of 5.8 and below the Virginia statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 26 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 12.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 20.7% of renter households in 2011.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 51041101013

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 51041101013?

Census tract 51041101013 in the Cameron Bay neighborhood scores 1.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 51041101013?

6.2% of residents in tract 51041101013 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,881.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 51041101013?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 40th, minority 38th, housing 3th.
Q4

Is tract 51041101013 considered part of Cameron Bay?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 51041101013 fall within Cameron Bay (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 51041101013?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 26 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 51041101013 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.48% of renter households, peaking at 20.7% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 51041101013 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 51041101013 compare to Brandermill overall?

Tract 51041101013 scores 1.6/10, lower than the parent city of Brandermill at 3.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brandermill; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related