Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally

Maple Glen Eviction Risk: Moderate , Kirkland

Tract 53033022003 · King County, WA · pop 5,411 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 53033022003 covers part of the Maple Glen area of Kirkland, WA, and scores 5.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 17% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units2,003
Renter share36.3%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate3.7%
Median income$130,066

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Maple Glen
Very Low
Within parent city
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 19 tracts In Kirkland
Very Low
Within county
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#385 of 494 tracts In King County
Low
Within state
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#986 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kirkland and the region

Centroid at 47.7258, -122.1985 · click any tract to drill in

Why Maple Glen scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kirkland
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
3.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,376 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kirkland
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kirkland
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kirkland
7.5

How Maple Glen compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Maple Glen risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.65.6This tracttract 022003Kirkland: 6.66.6Kirklandparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 116Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 1.64%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.7%Peak (2004)
  • 13Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530330220032004: 25 filings (3.74/100 renter HHs)2005: 16 filings (1.89/100 renter HHs)2006: 9 filings (1.06/100 renter HHs)2007: 13 filings (1.53/100 renter HHs)2008: 6 filings (0.71/100 renter HHs)2009: 3 filings (0.35/100 renter HHs)2010: 9 filings (1.32/100 renter HHs)2011: 6 filings (1.00/100 renter HHs)2012: 16 filings (2.67/100 renter HHs)2013: 13 filings (2.17/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 48% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Maple Glen. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Maple Glen

roughly one in two of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the King County average of 44.1%. Disability prevalence runs 18.5% against 31.5% nationally. Running cool, court filing pressure reads 2.3/10.

The severe-burden share is 14%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 7.6/10.

It sits 1.1 points below the King County average of 6.7. Court records carry 116 eviction filings across 10 observed years. The worst year on record was 2004, when 3.7% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 1.6% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 73rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 53033022003

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53033022003?

Census tract 53033022003 in the Maple Glen neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53033022003?

Median gross rent is $2,376/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53033022003?

3.7% of residents in tract 53033022003 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,411.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53033022003?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 6th, minority 49th, housing 34th.
Q5

Is tract 53033022003 considered part of Maple Glen?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53033022003 fall within Maple Glen (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53033022003?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 116 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 53033022003 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.64% of renter households, peaking at 3.7% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53033022003 compare to Kirkland overall?

Tract 53033022003 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Kirkland at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kirkland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kirkland

Top eight tracts in Kirkland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related