Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,878 of 84,120 nationally

6th Avenue Eviction Risk: Elevated , Tacoma

Tract 53053061300 · Pierce County, WA · pop 5,087 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Here is how census tract 53053061300, in 6th Avenue in Tacoma eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 6.4/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 5,087. That is riskier than about 84% of US census tracts.

About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,751 a month while the average household earns $78,346 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 56% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 25% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units2,067
Renter share55.7%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate20.1%
Median income$78,346

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In 6th Avenue
Very High
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
High
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#267 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.2500, -122.4590 · click any tract to drill in

Why 6th Avenue scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
20.1% poverty · this tract
5.0
Supply constraint
$1,751 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5

How 6th Avenue compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
6th Avenue risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.26.2This tracttract 061300Tacoma: 7.87.8Tacomaparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 694Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 6.35%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.2%Peak (2006)
  • 45Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530613002004: 69 filings (6.64/100 renter HHs)2005: 74 filings (7.65/100 renter HHs)2006: 89 filings (9.20/100 renter HHs)2007: 85 filings (8.79/100 renter HHs)2008: 61 filings (6.31/100 renter HHs)2009: 66 filings (6.83/100 renter HHs)2010: 54 filings (5.42/100 renter HHs)2012: 42 filings (4.08/100 renter HHs)2013: 49 filings (4.76/100 renter HHs)2014: 60 filings (5.83/100 renter HHs)2015: 45 filings (4.37/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 35% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 158Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.70×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (1.09× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (1.72× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-07-01: 6 filings (1.63× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2023-06-01: 14 filings (4.67× baseline)2023-07-01: 9 filings (2.45× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (2.18× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (1.09× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within 6th Avenue. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in 6th Avenue

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 694 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 6.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.2% of renter households in 2006.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053061300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053061300?

Census tract 53053061300 in the 6th Avenue neighborhood scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053061300?

Median gross rent is $1,751/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053061300?

20.1% of residents in tract 53053061300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,087.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053061300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 82th, household 61th, minority 64th, housing 42th.
Q5

Is tract 53053061300 considered part of 6th Avenue?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053061300 fall within 6th Avenue (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053061300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 694 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053061300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.35% of renter households, peaking at 9.2% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053061300 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.70× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053061300 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053061300 scores 6.2/10, lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 53053061300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 16% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related