Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally

Twin Lakes Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tacoma

Tract 53053940008 · Pierce County, WA · pop 7,387 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

With a score of 6.1/10, tract 53053940008 in the Twin Lakes neighborhood of Tacoma ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 7,387 residents. It lands near the 76th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 52% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,107 a month while the average household earns $106,013 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 41% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 19% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units2,541
Renter share40.6%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate7.2%
Median income$106,013

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Twin Lakes
Moderate
Within parent city
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#42 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
Very Low
Within county
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#76 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Elevated
Within state
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#781 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.2940, -122.3955 · click any tract to drill in

Why Twin Lakes scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
7.2% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$2,107 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5

How Twin Lakes compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Twin Lakes risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 940008Tacoma: 7.87.8Tacomaparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 273Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 3.11%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.7%Peak (2009)
  • 31Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530539400082004: 18 filings (2.54/100 renter HHs)2005: 24 filings (3.03/100 renter HHs)2006: 18 filings (2.27/100 renter HHs)2007: 24 filings (3.03/100 renter HHs)2008: 21 filings (2.65/100 renter HHs)2009: 37 filings (4.66/100 renter HHs)2010: 27 filings (3.52/100 renter HHs)2012: 23 filings (2.77/100 renter HHs)2013: 25 filings (3.01/100 renter HHs)2014: 25 filings (3.01/100 renter HHs)2015: 31 filings (3.73/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 72% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 157Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.70×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 9 filings (3.37× baseline)2022-07-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (8.27× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (10.45× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (7.46× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (15.15× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 10 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (3.01× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 7 filings (21.21× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (15.15× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Twin Lakes

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 47th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 273 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 3.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.7% of renter households in 2009.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053940008

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053940008?

Census tract 53053940008 in the Twin Lakes neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053940008?

Median gross rent is $2,107/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053940008?

7.2% of residents in tract 53053940008 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,387.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053940008?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 50th, minority 69th, housing 42th.
Q5

Is tract 53053940008 considered part of Twin Lakes?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053940008 fall within Twin Lakes (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053940008?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 273 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053940008 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.11% of renter households, peaking at 4.7% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053940008 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.70× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053940008 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053940008 scores 4.7/10, lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related