Skip to content
Ashland City, Tennessee eviction risk overview
City brief · 5,424 residents

Ashland City, TN Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Cheatham County · Population 5,424

In 2026
Risk score
1.9
VERY LOW

11th percentile, Tennessee.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average2.4 Now1.9
10 5 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.7 1978 · score 2.7 1979 · score 2.7 1980 · score 2.3 1981 · score 2.4 1982 · score 2.4 1983 · score 2.3 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.8 1986 · score 1.8 1987 · score 1.8 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.8 1990 · score 1.9 1991 · score 1.9 1992 · score 2.6 1993 · score 2.6 1994 · score 2.6 1995 · score 2.7 1996 · score 2.6 1997 · score 2.6 1998 · score 2.6 1999 · score 2.7 2000 · score 2.8 2001 · score 2.8 2002 · score 2.9 2003 · score 2.8 2004 · score 2.3 2005 · score 2.3 2006 · score 2.4 2007 · score 2.4 2008 · score 2.4 2009 · score 2.4 2010 · score 2.5 2011 · score 2.5 2012 · score 2.2 2013 · score 2.3 2014 · score 2.3 2015 · score 2.3 2016 · score 2.1 2017 · score 2.2 2018 · score 2.2 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 2.6 2021 · score 2.6 2022 · score 2.6 2023 · score 2.6 2024 · score 2.4 2025 · score 2.4 2026 · score 1.9

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.5 Regional 3.5 State 1.9 Economic 3.7 Supply 2.9 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 2.0 Tenant 2.2 Housing 2.4 1.9 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +45.9% (2024)
    3.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.5
  3. State political climate
    Tennessee legislature & governorship
    1.9
  4. Economic stress
    10.5% poverty · 3.5% unemp.
    3.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,336 average · 38.2% renters
    2.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    29.3% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    32 days filing → judgment
    2.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    38.2% renters
    2.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.4
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ashland City and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Ashland City compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Cheatham County
Very Low
#4 of 4 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileBottomTop
#4 of 4 cities in Cheatham County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Tennessee
Very Low
#447 of 501 cities
Rank in state, 11th percentileBottomTop
#447 of 501 cities in Tennessee for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Ashland City risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Ashland City: 1.91.9Ashland CityThis cityCounty: 2.32.3Countyavg in countyState: 3.33.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.9
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.9/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.7 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 32d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,336/mo. A contested eviction takes 32 days and costs $1,218-$2,999 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 38.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 5,424 residents, 38.2% rent. 29% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 10.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.5 and 3.5 (GOP margin +45.9% (2024)). State climate at 1.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2, housing court bias 2.4, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.7. Supply constraint: 2.9. The numbers behind those: 10.5% poverty, 3.5% unemployment, 29% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Ashland City sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government, TN · 37d · ~$2.1k all-in ($57/day) · score 4.5 Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government Clarksville, TN · 35d · ~$2.1k all-in ($59/day) · score 2.3 Clarksville Murfreesboro, TN · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($63/day) · score 2 Murfreesboro Franklin, TN · 35d · ~$2.1k all-in ($61/day) · score 1.4 Franklin Hendersonville, TN · 36d · ~$2.0k all-in ($54/day) · score 3.4 Hendersonville Smyrna, TN · 38d · ~$2.0k all-in ($52/day) · score 3.3 Smyrna Spring Hill, TN · 35d · ~$1.8k all-in ($52/day) · score 2.4 Spring Hill Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Knoxville, TN · 35d · ~$2.0k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.2 Knoxville Chattanooga, TN · 31d · ~$2.1k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.8 Chattanooga Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Ashland City
Ashland City · 32d · ~$2.1k all-in ($66/day) · score 1.9 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Ashland City, TN

Landlording in Ashland City, Tennessee, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.9/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Ashland City is a city of 5,424 residents where 38.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 29.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,336/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Ashland City eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Ashland City closes 32 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Ashland City's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Ashland City runs $1,218 to $2,999 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 32 days of typical timeline and $1,336/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.2/10 in Ashland City, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Tennessee, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Ashland City: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Tennessee's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,999 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Ashland City

Trap · 0.9/10
The 2.4/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. Ashland City's rent-control-risk sub-score is 0.9/10, driven by state preemption and market dynamics.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the shortest time I can evict a tenant in Ashland City for non-payment?

The shortest realistic timeline is around 32 days. This includes the 14-day pay-or-quit notice, court filing, hearing, and writ of possession execution. While theoretically possible to be quicker if a tenant leaves immediately after notice, plan for at least a month.
Q2

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Ashland City?

You are not legally required to have a lawyer for an eviction in Tennessee General Sessions Court. However, it's highly recommended, especially if this is your first eviction or if the tenant contests the eviction. An attorney ensures proper procedure and can navigate any legal complexities.
Q3

Can I turn off utilities if a tenant stops paying rent?

No, absolutely not. Turning off utilities, changing locks, or removing a tenant's belongings are considered illegal "self-help" evictions in Tennessee. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts. Violating this can lead to severe penalties.
Q4

Is there rent control in Ashland City or Tennessee?

No, there is no statewide rent control in Tennessee. Ashland City cannot enact its own rent control measures. This means you are generally free to set market rates for rent. For more information, see our Tennessee rent control rules.
Q5

What if the tenant leaves property behind after an eviction?

Tennessee law requires you to store a tenant's abandoned property for 30 days. You must send notice to the tenant's last known address. If they don't claim it, you can dispose of it or sell it, deducting reasonable storage and sale costs from the proceeds.
Q6

How important is proper notice serving for an eviction?

Properly serving notice is absolutely critical. If your 14-day pay-or-quit notice isn't served correctly, a judge can dismiss your entire case, forcing you to start over. This means more lost rent and more legal fees. Document everything related to notice delivery.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.9/10 places Ashland City in the 11th percentile of Tennessee cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.