Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #39,308 of 84,120 nationally

Red Bank Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 47065010800 · Hamilton County, TN · pop 4,040

Tract 47065010800 sits in Red Bank eviction risk, TN, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.6/10. It is home to 4,040 residents. Cost burden runs 52% here against 40.3% across Hamilton County.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27% Stable renters 25% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units2,070
Renter share51.5%
SVI overall0.66
Poverty rate13.8%
Median income$60,813

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Red Bank
Moderate
Within county
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#24 of 87 tracts In Hamilton County
Elevated
Within state
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#418 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
High
National
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#39,308 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Red Bank and the region

Centroid at 35.1026, -85.3079 · click any tract to drill in

Why Red Bank scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
13.8% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,095 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
6.4

How Red Bank compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Red Bank risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.6This tracttract 0108004.0Red Bankparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 66

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Red Bank

What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 8.3/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.8/10.

18% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.9/10.

Average gross rent is $1,095, 15% below the Red Bank average. Against the Hamilton County average of 3.9, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.7 points. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 53rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $60,813. 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 47065010800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47065010800?

Census tract 47065010800 in Red Bank scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 47065010800?

Median gross rent is $1,095/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 47065010800?

13.8% of residents in tract 47065010800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,040.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 47065010800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 66th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 66th, minority 43th, housing 48th.
Q5

How does tract 47065010800 compare to Red Bank overall?

Tract 47065010800 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Red Bank at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q6

Was tract 47065010800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank

Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related