Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally
Red Bank Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 47065010700 · Hamilton County, TN · pop 3,175 · 93% of tract blocks fall in Red Bank
Census tract 47065010700 covers part of Red Bank, TN, and scores 4.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,175 residents. 25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,612
Renter share50.6%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate15.9%
Median income$58,720
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
87
th percentile
High
Within state
85
th percentile
High
National
59
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Red Bank and the region
Centroid at 35.0956, -85.3014 · click any tract to drill in
Why Red Bank scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
15.9% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,059 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
6.4
How Red Bank compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 55%Socioeconomic
- 15%Household composition
- 25%Racial/ethnic minority
- 17%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 1%Grade A
- 24%Grade B
- 14%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Red Bank
52% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Hamilton County average of 40.3%. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 8.3/10.
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.8/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.9/10.
Average gross rent is $1,059, 17% below the Red Bank average. It sits 1.0 points above the Hamilton County average of 3.9. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chattanooga. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
Nationally it ranks #34,278 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.4/10.
Statewide the TN average is 3.9, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 47065010700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47065010700?
Census tract 47065010700 in Red Bank scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47065010700?
Median gross rent is $1,059/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47065010700?
15.9% of residents in tract 47065010700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,175.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47065010700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 15th, minority 25th, housing 17th.
Q5
How does tract 47065010700 compare to Red Bank overall?
Tract 47065010700 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Red Bank at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q6
Was tract 47065010700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank
Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related