Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #32,735 of 84,120 nationally
Red Bank Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 47065010700 · Hamilton County, TN · pop 3,175 · 93% of tract blocks fall in Red Bank
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 47065010700 (Red Bank, Tennessee) comes in at 5.3/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #43,486 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 52% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,059 monthly, set against $58,720 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 51% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,612
Renter share50.6%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate15.9%
Median income$58,720
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
63
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
62
th percentile
Elevated
National
61
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Red Bank and the region
Centroid at 35.0956, -85.3014 · click any tract to drill in
Why Red Bank scores 4.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
15.9% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,059 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
6.4
How Red Bank compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 55%Socioeconomic
- 15%Household composition
- 25%Racial/ethnic minority
- 17%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 1%Grade A
- 24%Grade B
- 14%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Red Bank
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 4.3 and above the Tennessee statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 47065010700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47065010700?
Census tract 47065010700 in Red Bank scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47065010700?
Median gross rent is $1,059/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47065010700?
15.9% of residents in tract 47065010700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,175.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47065010700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 15th, minority 25th, housing 17th.
Q5
How does tract 47065010700 compare to Red Bank overall?
Tract 47065010700 scores 4.5/10, higher than the parent city of Red Bank at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q6
Was tract 47065010700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank
Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related