Census Tract · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally
Ridgetop Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 47147080603 ·
Robertson County, TN · pop 4,971 · 18% of tract blocks fall in Ridgetop
In Ridgetop, census tract 47147080603 scores 4.3/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 17% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
37% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 37% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,409 a month against an average household income of $92,965 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 7% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 5%Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,827
Renter share7.4%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$92,965
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Ridgetop
Moderate
Within county
50th percentile
#8 of 15 tracts In Robertson County
Moderate
Within state
16th percentile
#1,428 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
Very Low
National
21th percentile
#66,742 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Ridgetop and the region
Centroid at 36.4193, -86.8753 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ridgetop scores 2.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ridgetop
3.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.7
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,409 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ridgetop
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ridgetop
4.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ridgetop
5.4
How Ridgetop compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 33
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Ridgetop, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Robertson County average of 4.1 and in line with the Tennessee statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 33rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 47147080603
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47147080603?
Census tract 47147080603 in Ridgetop scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47147080603?
Median gross rent is $1,409/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47147080603?
10.1% of residents in tract 47147080603 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,971.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47147080603?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 43th, minority 19th, housing 23th.
Q5
How does tract 47147080603 compare to Ridgetop overall?
Tract 47147080603 scores 2.5/10, right in line with the parent city of Ridgetop at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ridgetop; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.