Skip to content
Lufkin, Texas eviction risk overview
Ranked #1,811 of 1,865 nationally

Lufkin, TX Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Angelina County · Population 34,251

In 2026
Risk score
1.8
VERY LOW

34th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average3.5 Now1.8
10 5 1976 · score 2.1 1977 · score 2.1 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.3 1980 · score 2.0 1981 · score 2.1 1982 · score 2.1 1983 · score 2.1 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.1 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.3 1989 · score 2.3 1990 · score 2.4 1991 · score 2.4 1992 · score 2.7 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.8 1995 · score 2.8 1996 · score 2.8 1997 · score 2.8 1998 · score 2.9 1999 · score 3.0 2000 · score 3.5 2001 · score 3.6 2002 · score 3.7 2003 · score 3.7 2004 · score 3.8 2005 · score 3.9 2006 · score 3.9 2007 · score 4.0 2008 · score 4.2 2009 · score 4.3 2010 · score 4.3 2011 · score 4.4 2012 · score 4.4 2013 · score 4.5 2014 · score 4.6 2015 · score 4.7 2016 · score 4.9 2017 · score 5.1 2018 · score 5.3 2019 · score 5.5 2020 · score 6.1 2021 · score 6.2 2022 · score 6.2 2023 · score 6.2 2024 · score 5.4 2025 · score 5.5 2026 · score 1.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.4 Regional 3.4 State 1.5 Economic 7.8 Supply 7.6 Rent Control 7.1 Eviction 1.4 Tenant 9.0 Housing 7.4 1.8 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +52.0% (2024)
    3.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.4
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    19.2% poverty · 6.9% unemp.
    7.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,079 average · 48.4% renters
    7.6
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.0% of income on rent
    7.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    24 days filing → judgment
    1.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    48.4% renters
    9.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.4
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lufkin and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Lufkin compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Angelina County
Very Low
#7 of 7 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileBottomTop
#7 of 7 cities in Angelina County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Low
#1272 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 31st percentileBottomTop
#1272 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Lufkin risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Lufkin: 1.81.8LufkinThis cityCounty: 2.22.2Countyavg in countyState: 2.72.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.8
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 24d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,079/mo. A contested eviction takes 24 days and costs $888-$4,014 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 48.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 34,251 residents, 48.4% rent. 31% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 19.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.4 and 3.4 (GOP margin +52.0% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.4, housing court bias 7.4, rent-control risk 7.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.8. Supply constraint: 7.6. The numbers behind those: 19.2% poverty, 6.9% unemployment, 31% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Lufkin sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston San Antonio, TX · 25d · ~$2.4k all-in ($94/day) · score 2.8 San Antonio Dallas, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($89/day) · score 3.2 Dallas Austin, TX · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($92/day) · score 3.6 Austin Fort Worth, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Fort Worth El Paso, TX · 24d · ~$2.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 2.5 El Paso Arlington, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.7 Arlington Corpus Christi, TX · 26d · ~$2.6k all-in ($98/day) · score 2.3 Corpus Christi Plano, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($87/day) · score 2.1 Plano Lubbock, TX · 23d · ~$2.5k all-in ($109/day) · score 1.6 Lubbock Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Lufkin
Lufkin · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($102/day) · score 1.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Lufkin, TX

Landlording in Lufkin, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.8/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Lufkin is a city of 34,251 residents where 48.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,079/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Lufkin eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Lufkin closes 24 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Lufkin's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Lufkin runs $888 to $4,014 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 24 days of typical timeline and $1,079/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9/10 in Lufkin, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Lufkin: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,014 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Lufkin

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Lufkin to neighboring cities in Angelina County via the grid below. The 5.5/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under Property Code Chapter 24. Angelina County 2020 presidential margin: R+46.1. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Texas statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I change the locks if my Lufkin tenant is late on rent?

No, absolutely not. Changing locks, shutting off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings are illegal self-help eviction tactics in Texas. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts. Doing otherwise can lead to serious legal penalties against you.
Q2

How long does a tenant have to move out after an eviction judgment in Lufkin?

If you win your eviction case in Justice Court, the tenant has five days to appeal the decision. If they do not appeal, you can request a Writ of Possession, which is typically issued after the appeal period. Once the Writ is issued, the constable or sheriff will post a 24-hour notice before physically removing the tenant.
Q3

Is there rent control in Lufkin or Texas?

No. Texas has a statewide prohibition on rent control. This means Lufkin cannot implement its own rent control ordinances. You are generally free to set market rates for rent increases. For more information, see our Texas rent control rules.
Q4

What if my tenant claims I haven't made repairs?

If a tenant claims you haven't made necessary repairs, they must follow specific procedures under Texas Property Code. They must give you written notice of the repair issue, and you must have a reasonable time to fix it. If they withhold rent without following these rules, it's generally not a valid defense against eviction. Address repair requests promptly and document all communication.
Q5

Do I need an attorney for every eviction in Lufkin?

Not necessarily for every single case, especially simple non-payment evictions where the tenant doesn't appear. However, if the tenant hires an attorney, raises defenses, or appeals the judgment, hiring your own attorney is highly recommended. The cost of a lawyer often outweighs the risk of making a mistake that prolongs the eviction or results in a loss.
Q6

Can I charge late fees in Lufkin?

Yes, you can charge late fees in Texas, but they must be reasonable and stated clearly in your lease agreement. Texas law generally considers late fees reasonable if they are not more than 12% of the monthly rent for properties with four or fewer units, or 10% for properties with five or more units.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.8/10 places Lufkin in the 34th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.