Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Knox Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas

Tract 48113000901 · Dallas, TX · pop 2,426 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 48113000901 runs through the Knox area of Dallas. With 2,426 residents, it scores 4.4/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 19% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 21% of renter households, a modest level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,887 monthly, set against $114,699 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 74% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 58% Owners 26%
Tract context
Occupied units1,588
Renter share73.9%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$114,699

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 7 tracts In Knox
Elevated
Within parent city
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#295 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Very Low
Within county
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#466 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#4,720 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8163, -96.7841 · click any tract to drill in

Why Knox scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,887 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Knox compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Knox risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 000901Dallas: 2.72.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 204Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.70×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-04-01: 5 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-05-01: 12 filings (3.60× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2025-07-01: 7 filings (1.62× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (1.62× baseline)2025-11-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2025-12-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Knox. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Knox

What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Dallas eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Dallas County average of 5.2 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 6th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.70x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113000901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113000901?

Census tract 48113000901 in the Knox neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113000901?

Median gross rent is $1,887/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113000901?

2.6% of residents in tract 48113000901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,426.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113000901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 0th, minority 39th, housing 68th.
Q5

Is tract 48113000901 considered part of Knox?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113000901 fall within Knox (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113000901 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.70× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113000901 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113000901 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113000901 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related