Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Flower Mound Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48121021750 · Denton, TX · pop 4,662

48121021750 is a census tract in Flower Mound, TX. It scores 3/10 for landlords. The voucher gap is 41.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 5% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,521
Renter share9.3%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate1.5%
Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 18 tracts In Flower Mound
Low
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#129 of 193 tracts In Denton
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Flower Mound and the region

Centroid at 33.0254, -97.1102 · click any tract to drill in

Why Flower Mound scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Flower Mound
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
1.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,667 rent vs county FMR
9.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Flower Mound
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Flower Mound
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Flower Mound
4.1

How Flower Mound compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Flower Mound risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 021750Flower Mound: 3.43.4Flower Moundparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 19

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 31Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 7.40%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.7%Peak (2006)
  • 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481210217502001: 1 filings (3.60/100 renter HHs)2002: 1 filings (3.60/100 renter HHs)2003: 5 filings (17.99/100 renter HHs)2004: 5 filings (17.99/100 renter HHs)2005: 4 filings (7.11/100 renter HHs)2006: 6 filings (10.67/100 renter HHs)2007: 2 filings (3.56/100 renter HHs)2010: 4 filings (5.26/100 renter HHs)2011: 1 filings (1.61/100 renter HHs)2012: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2013: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 100% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 14Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.78×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Flower Mound

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.2/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10.

The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.1/10.

Average gross rent is $2,667, 20% above the Flower Mound average. The filing record is not thin: 31 evictions over 10 years of observation. It sits 0.8 points below the Denton County average of 3.8.

Filings peaked in 2006 at 10.7% of renter households. In a typical year about 7.4% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.7/10. Against average income of $250,001, annual rent is just 13%.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48121021750

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48121021750?

Census tract 48121021750 in Flower Mound scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48121021750?

Median gross rent is $2,667/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48121021750?

1.5% of residents in tract 48121021750 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,662.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48121021750?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 10th, household 6th, minority 54th, housing 63th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48121021750?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 31 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 48121021750 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.40% of renter households, peaking at 10.7% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48121021750 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.78× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48121021750 compare to Flower Mound overall?

Tract 48121021750 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Flower Mound at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Flower Mound eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Flower Mound

Top eight tracts in Flower Mound ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related