Skip to content
Sparks, Texas eviction risk overview
City brief · 4,134 residents

Sparks, TX Eviction Risk: LOW

El Paso County · Population 4,134

In 2026
Risk score
2.8
LOW

95th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.0 Average2.4 Now2.8
2.9 2.0 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.6 1978 · score 2.6 1979 · score 2.5 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.6 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.2 1985 · score 2.2 1986 · score 2.3 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.1 1989 · score 2.1 1990 · score 2.1 1991 · score 2.2 1992 · score 2.4 1993 · score 2.4 1994 · score 2.4 1995 · score 2.3 1996 · score 2.3 1997 · score 2.3 1998 · score 2.3 1999 · score 2.3 2000 · score 2.2 2001 · score 2.2 2002 · score 2.2 2003 · score 2.2 2004 · score 2.1 2005 · score 2.0 2006 · score 2.0 2007 · score 2.0 2008 · score 2.3 2009 · score 2.4 2010 · score 2.5 2011 · score 2.5 2012 · score 2.3 2013 · score 2.3 2014 · score 2.2 2015 · score 2.2 2016 · score 2.5 2017 · score 2.5 2018 · score 2.5 2019 · score 2.5 2020 · score 2.9 2021 · score 2.7 2022 · score 2.6 2023 · score 2.6 2024 · score 2.9 2025 · score 2.8 2026 · score 2.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.1 Regional 7.1 State 1.5 Economic 9.3 Supply 6.5 Rent Control 9.6 Eviction 1.0 Tenant 6.1 Housing 9.7 2.8 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +15.1% (2024)
    7.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.1
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    54.1% poverty · 10.2% unemp.
    9.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,080 average · 34.2% renters
    6.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    51.0% of income on rent
    9.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    23 days filing → judgment
    1.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    34.2% renters
    6.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    9.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sparks and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Sparks compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in El Paso County
High
#4 of 18 cities
Rank in county, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#4 of 18 cities in El Paso County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Very High
#175 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 91st percentileLowHigh
#175 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Sparks risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Sparks: 2.82.8SparksThis cityCounty: 3.03.0Countyavg in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.8
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 23d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,080/mo. A contested eviction takes 23 days and costs $894–$3,180 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 34.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 4,134 residents, 34.2% rent. 51% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 54.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.1 and 7.1 (Dem margin +15.1% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1, housing court bias 9.7, rent-control risk 9.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-4.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 9.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 9.3. Supply constraint: 6.5. The numbers behind those: 54.1% poverty, 10.2% unemployment, 51% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Sparks sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) El Paso, TX · 24d · ~$2.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 3.1 El Paso Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston San Antonio, TX · 25d · ~$2.4k all-in ($94/day) · score 2.8 San Antonio Dallas, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($89/day) · score 2.7 Dallas Austin, TX · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($92/day) · score 2.9 Austin Fort Worth, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.6 Fort Worth Arlington, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.6 Arlington Corpus Christi, TX · 26d · ~$2.6k all-in ($98/day) · score 2.7 Corpus Christi Plano, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($87/day) · score 2.3 Plano Lubbock, TX · 23d · ~$2.5k all-in ($109/day) · score 2.7 Lubbock Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Sparks
Sparks · 23d · ~$2.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 2.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Sparks, TX

Landlording in Sparks, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.8/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Sparks is a city of 4,134 residents where 34.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 51.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,080/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Sparks eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Sparks closes 23 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Sparks's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 9.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Sparks runs $894 to $3,180 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 23 days of typical timeline and $1,080/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.1/10 in Sparks, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (9.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Sparks: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,180 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Sparks

Trap · 34.2%
34.2% renter share against 4,134 residents produces roughly 1,415 rental occupants in Sparks. El Paso County voted D 35.1% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Sparks for reasons other than non-payment?

Yes, you can. If a tenant violates other terms of the lease, such as having unauthorized pets, damaging the property, or engaging in illegal activity, you can typically evict them. The notice period for these types of violations is usually also a 3-day notice to cure the violation or vacate, though your lease can specify a longer period. Always refer to your lease and Texas Property Code § 91 & § 92.

Q2

What if my tenant claims I haven't made repairs?

Texas law requires landlords to maintain a safe and habitable property. If a tenant properly notifies you of a repair issue that affects health or safety, and you fail to address it within a reasonable time, they might have a defense against eviction for non-payment. However, they must follow specific procedures, like providing written notice. Don't ignore repair requests; address them promptly and document everything.

Q3

Can I change the locks if my tenant abandons the property?

You can only change the locks if you have clear evidence of abandonment, which typically means the tenant has moved out all their belongings, stopped paying rent, and has given you no indication they intend to return. Even then, it's safer to get a court order or send a formal notice of abandonment to avoid claims of illegal lockout. When in doubt, pursue an eviction.

Q4

How much notice do I need to give to raise the rent in Sparks?

Texas law doesn't specify a minimum notice period for rent increases, but it must be "reasonable." For a month-to-month lease, typically a 30-day written notice is considered reasonable. For a fixed-term lease, you cannot raise the rent until the lease term expires, unless the lease agreement specifically allows for it. Always provide written notice.

Q5

Can I accept partial rent payments during the eviction process?

Accepting a partial rent payment after serving a notice to vacate can be risky. It often "waives" your right to continue with that specific eviction filing, meaning you might have to start the entire eviction process over again with a new notice. If you're considering accepting a partial payment, consult with an attorney first to understand the implications.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.8/10 places Sparks in the 95th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.