Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally

Park Place Eviction Risk: Moderate , Deer Park

Tract 48201320100 · Harris, TX · pop 2,539 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

The Park Place area of Deer Park anchors census tract 48201320100, which lands at 4.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 30% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,035 a month while the average household earns $55,893 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 72% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 50% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units1,068
Renter share72.0%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate16.3%
Median income$55,893

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Park Place
High
Within parent city
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#403 of 952 tracts In Deer Park
Elevated
Within county
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#438 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
Elevated
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#1,918 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Deer Park and the region

Centroid at 29.6947, -95.2813 · click any tract to drill in

Why Park Place scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Deer Park
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
16.3% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$1,035 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Deer Park
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Deer Park
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Deer Park
2.5

How Park Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Park Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.94.9This tracttract 320100Deer Park: 2.32.3Deer Parkparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 222Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 4.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.1%Peak (2013)
  • 37Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482013201002009: 27 filings (5.23/100 renter HHs)2010: 30 filings (4.71/100 renter HHs)2011: 19 filings (2.76/100 renter HHs)2012: 24 filings (3.49/100 renter HHs)2013: 49 filings (7.12/100 renter HHs)2014: 36 filings (5.23/100 renter HHs)2015: 37 filings (5.38/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 37% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 213Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.97×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 8 filings (2.91× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (2.22× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (2.22× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (2.22× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 7 filings (2.55× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (2.22× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (3.11× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2025-09-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (1.78× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Park Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Park Place

What moves this score most is economic stress at 4.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Deer Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Harris County average of 5.2 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.97x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201320100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201320100?

Census tract 48201320100 in the Park Place neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201320100?

Median gross rent is $1,035/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201320100?

16.3% of residents in tract 48201320100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,539.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201320100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 82th, minority 96th, housing 87th.
Q5

Is tract 48201320100 considered part of Park Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201320100 fall within Park Place (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201320100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 222 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201320100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.85% of renter households, peaking at 7.1% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201320100 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.97× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48201320100 compare to Deer Park overall?

Tract 48201320100 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Deer Park at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Deer Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 48201320100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Deer Park

Top eight tracts in Deer Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related