In court-decided eviction outcomes for Cactus, TX, tenants prevail in roughly 11.3% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses, longer calendars, and more required documentation, and landlord-friendliness drops as this rises.
Timeline
27d
filing → judgment
From the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Cactus, TX until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 27 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent and higher carry costs for landlords.
Cost range
$1.0–3.9k
legal + lost rent
A typical eviction in Cactus, TX costs landlords $966 to $3,880 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent during the calendar between filing and possession.
Average rent
$816
24% stretched on rent
Average gross rent in Cactus, TX is $816 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey (5-year 2023). 24% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent, the federal cost-burden threshold.
Renters
66.7%
of households
66.7% of occupied housing units in Cactus, TX are renter-occupied (vs owner-occupied). A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings, more turnover, and a more active rental market.
Poverty
17.9%
2.3% unemp.
17.9% of Cactus, TX residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 2.3%. Both feed into the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model because rent payment problems track poverty + joblessness more reliably than any other single signal.
Time machine
Scrub 50 years
197619861996200620162026
2026
● LIVE · today◀ REPLAY · historical
Nine-axis profile
9-axis profile · today
Shape of the risk surface
1 landlord · 10 tenant
Sub-scores · with sparkline
Where the score comes from
1 → 10 scale
Local political climate
GOP margin +67.1% (2024)
2.8
Regional political climate
County-weighted neighbor mix
2.8
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
17.9% poverty · 2.3% unemp.
5.9
Supply constraint
$816 average · 66.7% renters
6.1
Rent Control risk
23.6% of income on rent
3.3
Eviction process difficulty
27 days filing → judgment
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
66.7% renters
9.5
Housing court bias
County bench composition
5.4
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cactus and the region
Click any city to see its score
How Cactus compares
Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Moore County
Moderate
#2of 3 cities
#2 of 3 cities in Moore County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Moderate
#1031of 1,841 cities
#1031 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Score story
Six-stop tour of the risk profile
2.2
/ 10 · VERY LOW
The verdict
A Very low-tier market.
Composite 2.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.
50-yr trend+0.2 over 50 yr
197620012026
Steady ratchet · no large swings
27d
Typical timeline
The money
What renting (and evicting) looks like.
Rent published at $816/mo. A contested eviction takes 27 days and costs $966–$3,880 per case.
50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
197620012026
Court-clerk data lands in the next release.
66.7%
Renters
The renters
Who you'll be renting to.
Out of 3,091 residents, 66.7% rent. 24% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 17.9% below the poverty line.
50-yr trendRenter share rising
197620012026
ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.
2.8
Local + regional
The politics
Light-statute interior market.
Local & regional political climate score 2.8 and 2.8 (GOP margin +67.1% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.
50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
197620012026
Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.
1.5
State politics
The process
Moderate calendar, moderate friction.
State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.3, housing court bias 5.4, rent-control risk 3.3. Standard process speed for the state.
50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.7 since '00
197620012026
Court-clerk data lands in the next release.
5.9
Economic stress
The stress
Economic pressure is the background risk.
Economic stress: 5.9. Supply constraint: 6.1. The numbers behind those: 17.9% poverty, 2.3% unemployment, 24% of income on rent.
50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
197620012026
Mirrors BLS unemployment series.
US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost
Cactus sits in the quick & cheap quadrant
Bubble size = population · color = risk score
Cactus · 27d · ~$2.4k all-in ($90/day) · score 2.2National average: 58d · $4.6k all-inHover any bubble for stats · click to openColor: 0–4 4–7 7–10
Landlording in Cactus, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.
Cactus is a city of 3,091 residents where 66.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 23.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $816/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.
01Process
How Cactus eviction process actually works
Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Cactus closes 27 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.
The slow part of Cactus's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.
02Cost
What it costs (and how long it takes)
An all-in eviction in Cactus runs $966 to $3,880 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.
For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 27 days of typical timeline and $816/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.
03Operations
Security deposits, screening, and lease terms
Tenant organizing strength scores 9.5/10 in Cactus, and the city has limited rent control exposure (3.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:
Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy
What an everyday landlord should actually do here
If you own one to four units in Cactus: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.
The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,880 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.
04bPractical traps
Local traps to avoid in Cactus
Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Cactus to neighboring cities in Moore County via the grid below. The 3.6/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under Property Code Chapter 24. Moore County 2020 presidential margin: R+59.9. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Texas statutory detail.
05FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Q1
What's the best way to handle a tenant who's a few days late on rent?
First, send a polite reminder. If payment isn't made within a few more days, issue the formal 3-day pay-or-quit notice as required by Texas law. Be firm but professional. Don't let late payments slide for too long; consistency is key.
Q2
Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Cactus?
You can represent yourself in Justice Court, but it's highly recommended to use an attorney for eviction proceedings. They ensure proper procedure, file all documents correctly, and can save you time and money by avoiding delays due to errors. The cost of a lawyer is often less than the cost of a botched eviction.
Q3
Can I charge a late fee for rent in Texas?
Yes, Texas law allows landlords to charge reasonable late fees. These fees must be specified in your lease agreement. The fee must be reasonable and not exceed certain statutory limits, which are based on a percentage of the monthly rent. Don't just make up a number; check the rules.
Q4
Is there rent control in Cactus, TX?
No, there is no rent control in Cactus or anywhere else in Texas. Texas has a statewide prohibition against rent control. This means you are generally free to set rent prices as you deem appropriate, subject to market conditions. For more, see our Texas rent control rules.
Q5
What if my tenant refuses to leave after the eviction is granted?
If the court grants you possession and the tenant still won't leave after the appeal period, you must obtain a Writ of Possession from the court. This writ authorizes the constable or sheriff to physically remove the tenant and their belongings. You cannot remove them yourself. This is the final, legal step.
Q6
Are there any tenant protections I should be aware of in Texas?
While Texas is landlord-friendly, tenants do have rights. These include the right to a safe and habitable living environment, proper notice for entry, and specific procedures for security deposit returns. There's no statewide source-of-income protection or just-cause eviction requirement. Staying compliant with basic tenant rights prevents legal issues. Check our Texas tenant protections guide.
A 2.2/10 places Cactus in the 46th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.
Cities with similar eviction risk to Cactus (2.2/10)
Same risk band nationally · click any city for its full breakdown.
