Clinton Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49011125305 · Davis, UT · pop 6,460
Census tract 49011125305 covers part of Clinton, UT, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,460 residents. 10% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Davis County average of 38.9%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Clinton and the region
Centroid at 41.1326, -112.0501 · click any tract to drill in
Why Clinton scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Clinton compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 15%Socioeconomic
- 23%Household composition
- 38%Racial/ethnic minority
- 11%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 47Total filings over 7 yrs
- 2.50%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.6%Peak (2014)
- 5Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.1%Housing insecurity
- 5.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.2%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 6.2%Transit barriers
- 9.6%No health insurance
- 17.7%Frequent mental distress
- 27.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Clinton
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.2/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.5/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.9/10.
SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally. 10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The filing record is not thin: 47 evictions over 7 years of observation.
The voucher gap is 13.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Food insecurity runs 10.2% against 17.8% nationally.
It sits 0.6 points below the Davis County average of 3.6. The worst year on record was 2014, when 4.6% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 2.5% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.9/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 49011125305
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125305?
What is the average rent in tract 49011125305?
What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125305?
How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125305?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011125305?
What share of households in tract 49011125305 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 49011125305 compare to Clinton overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Clinton
Top eight tracts in Clinton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.