1 census tracts · pop 7,042 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3/10
· range 3–3
North Station District maps to a single census tract in South Jordan, UT, population 7,042. It carries an Eviction Risk Score of 3/10, in the Lower tier. Cost burden runs 53% against 27.9% citywide, putting North Station District 24.9% over its own city.
The main counterweight is economic stress, at 1/10. Average gross rent is $1,456, 27% below the South Jordan average of $1,991.
On the softer side is eviction-process difficulty, at 1.9/10. Severe burden reaches 13%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears.
SNAP participation is 6.6% of households versus 15.2% nationally. Among the 10 mapped neighborhoods of South Jordan, it ranks #2 by risk, the upper third. At 25% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out.
The closest comparables inside the same city are Heritage Heights and Creekside Village. Against average income of $112,247, annual rent is only 16%, a wide affordability cushion.
Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Because the boundary contains one tract, 3/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Risk score
3
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
North Station District vs South JordanHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority56%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport78%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in North Station District
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
12.0%Housing insecurity
7.5%Utility shutoff threat
14.5%Food insecurity
6.6%SNAP enrollment
11.3%No health insurance
26.6%Any disability
Frequently asked
About North Station District
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for North Station District?
North Station District scores 3/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does North Station District compare to South Jordan overall?
North Station District scores 0.4 points lower than South Jordan overall (3.4/10). Renters spend 53% of income on rent vs 28% citywide. Average rent: $1,456 vs $1,991.
Q3
What is the average rent in North Station District?
Average gross rent in North Station District is $1,456/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of North Station District residents are renters?
25% of North Station District households are renter-occupied (vs 19% in South Jordan). The neighborhood has 7,042 residents.
Q5
Is North Station District a high social-vulnerability area?
North Station District sits in the 63rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
How safe is North Station District for landlords?
North Station District carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to South Jordan as a whole (3.4/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7
What is the demographic breakdown of North Station District?
North Station District has 7,799 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (66.5%), Hispanic / Latino (20.4%), Other / Multiracial (8.2%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
