Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally
Enterprise Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49053270200 · Washington, UT · pop 2,916 · 18% of tract blocks fall in Enterprise
Here is how census tract 49053270200, in Enterprise in Washington County, looks to a landlord: a 1.8/10 eviction-risk score (Lower tier) across a population of 2,916. That places it near the bottom of the national scale, one of the easier tracts in the country for landlords.
About 12% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,244 a month while the average household earns $84,421 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 8% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,139
Renter share8.2%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate3.7%
Median income$84,421
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
21
th percentile
Low
Within state
49
th percentile
Moderate
National
15
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Enterprise and the region
Centroid at 37.4621, -113.6760 · click any tract to drill in
Why Enterprise scores 2.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Enterprise
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.4
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
3.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,244 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Enterprise
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Enterprise
1.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Enterprise
2.2
How Enterprise compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 19
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 36%Socioeconomic
- 28%Household composition
- 0%Racial/ethnic minority
- 19%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 3Total filings over 1 yrs
- 1.94%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.9%Peak (2015)
- 3Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.0%Housing insecurity
- 5.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.1%Food insecurity
- 4.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.3%Transit barriers
- 8.1%No health insurance
- 15.0%Frequent mental distress
- 31.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Enterprise
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 3.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Enterprise, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Washington County average of 3.4 and below the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 3 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 1.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.9% of renter households in 2015.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 49053270200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49053270200?
Census tract 49053270200 in Enterprise scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49053270200?
Median gross rent is $1,244/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 12% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49053270200?
3.7% of residents in tract 49053270200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,916.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49053270200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 28th, minority 0th, housing 19th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49053270200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 49053270200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.94% of renter households, peaking at 1.9% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 49053270200 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49053270200 compare to Enterprise overall?
Tract 49053270200 scores 2.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Enterprise at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Enterprise; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related